Thats actually because of a different rule that if that nation already has a bunch of vehicles in said spot they put that country on the back burner since they arent lacking, (no nation should be excluded from their own vehicles) also trying to turn this argument into a sweden bias is sad.
So this whole sweden bias is a dumb argument its a rule gaijin made which also in turn prevents finland from getting their HA 75-2 so yes its very biased. We could go on and on but thats not worth it since you only see sweden in a negative light and cant even bother to look at a nation you dont like because your 12.
For some reason Gaijin will forever find it 3x more necessary to add another ZSU (this new one marks the 11th ZSU ingame, 5th in the Russian TT) rather than actually adding a non-paywall heavy tank to Sweden. At least we got the Tiger and it definitely isnt locked behind a large paywall and now a software restriction.
Sadly the Kranvagn is the last option left and Gaijin will probably never add that either because they’re too lazy to or there “weren’t enough vehicles built”
That’s like complaining about America having too many “M” tanks, ZSU literally just a designation for a vehicle.
That being said, this will be presumably the third update in a row Russia gets a SPAA/premium tank, provided the KV-1 (1942) doesn’t get added to the TT. I am quite tired of that.
Sorry let me be more specific, Shilkas and other SPAA of similar design but different designation (I included all ZSU’s past Rank V, so ZSU-57, ZSU-37, and ZSU-23)
It is a little annoying that Russia keeps getting SPAA seeing as they really don’t need them. US has a 3.7 BR gap, GBR has a 3.0, Japan a 3.0, and France a 2.7 gap. I get that there aren’t many vehicles that could fill these gaps but why does Gaijin add more SPAA to a tree that from Tier III up has a max gap of 2.0 at the beginning and then no more than 1.3 for the rest of the TT. I’m not one of those “Muh Russian Bias!” kids but holy hell does Gaijin really love giving Russia unneeded SPAA
Yeah I think the F-14C mightve been a prototype that evolved to the F-14D or mightve never existed. Afaik there are only 3 Tomcat standard variants, F-14A, F-14B, and F-14D
I sympathize with you. Japan is one of the 5 OG nations of WT. Should not be treated like second hand minor nation. But it is. All those “kill with heavy tank” or “kill with attacker aircraft” japan cant even do those tasks. BRs keep getting higher because no new players play japan and gaijin only cares about the K/D and not if the tank actually is equal (well mainly because there isnt even option to start with japan ground in wt). + there are no proper camos for japan.
They just wanna force people that play japan, italy or sweden/finland to spend money on the game or grind some event vehicle while rest of the nations gets those for free.
Like I couldnt if they add O-I as event vehicle fr.
I have seen the armor model in the Dev stream, and dam its allready a outdated modeling.
The 31mm front add on plate is the same plate as the base Hull MG. They count as 1. And overall meh.
1.Literally has weaker turret armor than the KV-1C and cant angle the turret like the Zis-5 at 4.7 so what lie is that?
Powerful aphe? Average pen? Im pretty sure aside from spaa this is the weakest gun at 5.0 with most other 5.0 tabks having the same or better armor while have 140mm pen guns so this entire stats page is a blatant lie.