The bradley got IRST which it never had irl, so we clearly have unrealistic vehicles.
1 Like
I have studied this further and been in contact with moderators. We will have to wait and see if any AHEAD or KETF will be implemented, likely the Dutch CV90 will get the KETF eventually. The Danish defence forces are more sparse in official information but we do know they use ABM but to what extent is anyones guess.
All CV90s can fire ABM, every 35 mm has the same programable muzzle, however, the sights can vary, the Dutch CV90 use a french sight with an extension for IRST and the UTAAS sight which is a hybrid tracking sight without IRST is used in most other CV’s. As we all know IRST is not needed to fire ABM but it is needed toghether with the VTM module to “automaticly” search, acquire and track a target, something the MkIV vehicles have in its standard configuration but not every older vehicle (depending on specification) has it.
A bug or suggestion has been acknowledged and forwarded to developers regarding the Dutch CV9035 and its KETF, they also use an IRST module for those who like to know.
I would like to see both 9035s get KETF since both uses it. It is likely that the Danish CV9035 has the same function as the Dutch one since the Danish had the same demands on its functionality and configuration as the Dutch, there are also an extension for IRST visible on their vehicles on some pictures. Perhaps the Dutch could get the IRST and the Danish could get it implemented using LR as a means to set the fuze and fire.
1 Like
Beliebe me when i say its completly useless in that regard.
The shrapnel is to nerfed, to reliably work in that mode
Agree, its underperforming so it would be difficult to shot down any air targets, a plane would be near impossible for instance.
The only thing you gonna hit with ahead is a braindead hovering helicopter.
Or a Su 25 flying straight at you and u hit it with the unexploded round.
If you manualy laze the target and shoot it wont be atbthe position anymore where it would explode
Correct, that would be the main problem. The Dutch one wont have that problem but the danish would. I am still trying to get more official info about the Danish CV but it is more difficult.
If progression means growth of spawn camping and one death leavers, I don’t see how you can say that’s a good progression. And why did you tag me in a month later? If you want my attention, you can DM me.
Spawn camping is people failing to defend.
And one death leaving is people refusing to get more rewards.
If I play during China’s daylight hours, one-death-leave is not anywhere close to popular, cause they understand it’s inefficient.
1 Like
Then you get a very different sort of Chinese player because I can count dozens such who one death leave.
Spawn camping is not a failing to defend, it’s a failing of the map design and the gamestyle. That’s on Gaijin for encouraging it.
Hence why I argue for bigger maps and multiple spawn points (minimum 4) to flank possible campers and ensure they don’t do that.
Whether you agree or not is not my problem, that simply is how it is.
1 Like
I agree with both of you 😀
USUALLY “spawn camping” happens when one team has been mostly wiped out, often by 1 death quitters and/or people rushing face first and dying 3 times in a couple minutes.
HOWEVER, small maps ESPECIALLY coupled with the Conquest game mode (ONE single capture zone) makes it effectively impossible to counter an enemy team once they get entrenched. Even with my light tanks and/or CAS runs it is almost always a one sided match, more so the higher BR the match is.
I think multiple spawn points need to be done for all matches say, 8.0-9.0+ BR. Below that, perhaps it would be nice. But absolutely once you get to 10.0+ the tiny maps are HORRID. I have almost stopped playing my beloved light tank line ups at 10.0 because half the matches I get are conquest and extremely frustrating to play, especially on a 150m/200m grid sized map.
1 Like
Carpathians. Hold A. All you have to do now.
No one listens. People get roflstomped.
And then there’s the single sniper point that allows them to overwatch the entire damn map on approach if they sneak all the way around, on top of a damn mountain.
A. Mountain.
Map design that should be left to early Cold War or lower BRs.
Period.
1 Like
Sad, because I really do like that map but yeah, and in GRB it is just TOXIC at high BRs. (Even in mid/high BR GAB its bad, but nothing like how awful it is in GRB). Idk if it would make it great, but they could make that a 300-400m grid sized, change A to B, and put a new A way up North/West. Then holding the mountain would be much more ‘dangerous’ and you would have to watch your entire surroundings for enemies coming up. Also get that south spawn point WAY back so you can’t get shot down on from the mountain, locking you in spawn. /hope
1 Like
I like the map fine. I can even fight it in top tier, but players are dumb, the mountain sniping position should be eradicated, and the widening of the map but not the cap points eliminated options. It’s better for lower tiers below 7.3.
Edit: They could just give me the mapmakers and I’d design plenty of 9.0 maps
1 Like
it’s an export gun, and if the Denmark never bought AHEAD rounds to use, it shouldn’t have it.
My apologies for the wrongful OG topic its supposed to be KETF which is almost the same as AHEAD. From what i know they dont have AHEAD but KETF is in their arsenal and videos of them firing it are available. In short we know they use ABM and have the cabalilities for ABM with different extension modules but there is the issue of finding official documentation, much in regards to the war in Ukraine.
I mean, the CV90’s should have the BOFORS 3P round, I’ve never heard of this one, I’d have to do some research on it.
Edit: Within 30 second of looking I found this on it.
From this forum
https://community.battlefront.com/topic/136545-dutch-cv9035-ketf-abm-rounds/
This video shows a similar ABM round from the CV I was talking about
@ 4:20
1 Like
thats the 40mm version, not useable for the other vehicles, they use completly different guns, the 30mm-35mm ueses bushmasters
I know that, I also put the round for the 35, but I was making a general statement that the CV9040 is missing the 3P
1 Like
thats confusing since you didnt speak about the cv9040 specialy earlier xD
and the topic is about the cv9035
Generally speaking, when I say CV90, I mean Strf 9040, but I should have clarified.
Although I did say:
1 Like