in short you are coping for a missile becasue you have no sources to back your nonsense up
but sure go ahead try making a suggestion which will get shut down for the lack of sources
No, I did have sources, I provided them, because it was the only ones available, that i could find, Even tho you call it nonesense, I call it An attempt, If you find any More Source that Mention the KH-25ML compatibility send IT, without arguing on your one sided opinion, all the family of Ka-50 was Compatible with Kh-25ML, All of sources and even the Russian documents provided that, your not the russian federation to say what have or did not, if Yes or no, Provide a reason, a reliable source, then back and Mention it, without calling it nonesense.
I will wait for you to send some Sources for it, i will be happy for you to share what you could find.
you dont
Oh okay, What about sending me your sources?
I am aware Janes\Wiki sites are not suitable as a standalone Sources for war thunder suggestion only if they were backed with a primary reliable source that fulfill the suggestion requirements.
THERE ARE NO SOURCES
thats the whole point
there are NONE to put the Kh-25ML onto the Ka-50
1 Like
So your point is it have no reliable sources, and the Ka50 did not have kh25ML correct?
then why dont you answer a simple question, Provide one if you are not satisified with it.
this is all i could find, arguing about me not having other sources is not my problem, this are the one in the internet.
there is literally four pictures of it Ka-50-2 a predecessor of the Ka-50 that have a compatible applicable pylons to share the same points with the ka-50 for Kh-25ML missile usage.
the Ka-50-2 IS NOT a predecessor of the Ka-50
IT CAME AFTER IT
sorry i meant that.
so just because the F-18E can use the Aim-174 the F-18A should get it as well
same logic you are using for the Ka-50 to get the Kh-25ML shown on the Ka-52
this is off topic.