The K2 can be located in a few tech trees, as the K2 has had variations designed for Poland (K2PL), Norway (K2NO amd yes I know they went for the Leopard 2A7 instead) and the Middle East (K2ME) such as UAE or SA meaning that nations such as Sweden (Norway) or even something like Germany (Poland).
And with the deals with Rafael, Israel could also receive the K2 tank, maybe as the K2ME?
how much times were Polish vehicles denied for Germany?
1 Like
To be fair, not as many times as canada and audtralia have been denied as subtrees
prem?? good god no
Point still stands, more polish vehicles were denied for Germany
Anyone ever tried to estimate K279 Improved penetration? I tried here, but i dont really know if these infos i put in the sim are right
With joint Korean tech tree basically confirmed I think it’d be better to have K2 just be there, and any foreign variants could be premiums/squadron vehicles for that tt.
Sweden will have plenty with both Strv123 and potentially 2A8NOR.
Leo 2PL in German tt is there because it was made by Germany and follows the same logic as Canadian 2A4M or Polish Sherman “Trzyniec” in UK tt.
We should fight for the techtrees to be unique again, rather than have everyone have the same stuff. This is the direction which I think would be the best for the game.
+1 would be interesting to see how effective it will be
I agree, top tier korea ground can have a lineup of K2 and its variations. If we spread out the k2 to other trees there won’t be an incentive to grind korea’s tech tree since pre modern era its alot of copy paste.