There is indeed photographic evidence, I just saw it today. Do you need me to search for it for you? But KH38 and PANS1, as equipment that entered service in 2012 and 2017, did appear in the game too early. Other countries require equipment with the same level of technology and at least the same combat capability as a balance, such as AGM130 or YJ83KH
1 Like
more,
Excellent posts across the board.
Here’s hoping this is both true and this gets added. Good work.
1 Like
The problem is,this one and many in other photos are not Kh-38MTE. MTE and MLE use different seerker and you can see the difference between them,this one is a MLE
JH-7A currently lacks C-704KD air to surface missile // Gaijin.net // Issues
Instead of KH29, just give it the C-704KD missile which was already passed.
1 Like
CM704 is indeed good, but there is one problem. As a foreign trade missile with limited production, not many aircraft have used it, JH7A? Perhaps there is also Iran’s F4E, but there is no evidence of other Chinese aircraft such as J10, J11B, J15, J16 mounting and using CM704, and their popularity is much lower than the US AGM65 or the Russian KH29. Therefore, if possible, I still hope to add the YJ83KH/CM502B, an infrared imaging anti-ship missile widely equipped by PLAAF. According to its foreign trade version, it has the ability to strike land targets just like the KH29
Ultimately YJ-83 should come as it is the most common anti-ship missle used by Chinese aircraft, but I doubt we will get it until the Russian get a similar missle first.
Russians have already obtained better things. The cruising speed of YJ83 is 0.9 Mach, and the terminal diving speed is only 1.3 Mach. When using IR guidance as an anti tank missile for combat, considering the similar technical level, YJ83KH’s locking distance to tanks will not be much different from AGM65GKH38, but its speed and power are far inferior to KH38. The YJ83, which uses GPS guidance as a cruise missile, will not perform stronger than the KH36 due to its speed and power. As for being an anti-ship missile… Haha, who would use the anti-ship missiles in WT to attack ships
1 Like
But I think YJ-83 has 200km+ range? I am not sure they will let China get a 200+ missile in the game first.
1 Like
This is indeed a problem, but the 200km range can only be maximized when attacking ships or using GPS guidance to strike fixed targets. I think Gaijin can retain one of the multiple guidance methods like Brimstone, such as IR guidance like AGM65KH38
In addition, the KH36 in the game already has a maximum range of 160km, and it is not surprising that YJ83 has obtained a larger range with lower speed and power. It is not too late to restore all the characteristics of YJ83 when we need to fight against modern destroyers from hundreds of kilometers away in future games. Now we only need a widely equipped ground missile that can attack tanks. Moving targets like tanks cannot be locked beyond 20km. Without a “human in the loop” system like KD88, the extra range is obviously meaningless
2 Likes
Gaijin can make some reductions in range, a Mach 1.3 YJ83 will not be more unbalanced than a KH38, and four YJ83s are definitely not as strong as 6 KH38s.
1 Like
gaijin, why can’t China get their own air-to-surface missiles, why？ why？ why？
2 Likes
Has anyone actually made a suggestion for yj83’s?
Now that it’s common for other lineages to have 4 to 6 ammo that doesn’t care after firing, gaijin should return the 4 kh29te from the jh7a. Especially now that the su34 is in the game as well
I had no expectations for the Chinese vehicle, despite the obvious and solid evidence presented by the Chinese players, the official will still have any unexpected reasons to deny it, I am very disappointed in the game, the arrival of the new version has made the already shaky balance more fragmented. With the exception of the United States and the Soviet Union, players in other countries are playing with different disadvantages, which will be further expanded in the next version, and the authorities are blind to the correct and informed reactions of players.Because I only developed Chinese vehicles, I really felt the official malice towards Chinese vehicles, just using “not a bug” to deny players’ contribution to the authenticity of vehicles and game fairness, would the official like to see the proportion of you weakening Chinese vehicles and strengthening Chinese vehicles? You only have to choose between historical truth and game fairness to continue nerfing vehicles, if you only want some countries players should be beaten by the Soviet Union and the United States, then why don’t you add other countries to the United States and the Soviet Union?Vehicles in other countries will also choose to nerf between game balance and historical reality, this is only a matter of degree, the official is only in the guise of restoring history and game balance to nerf vehicles, I am extremely disappointed in this game, because I have also contributed to my own vehicle game fairness and historical reality.
2 Likes
Already marked not a bug
1 Like