probably because of this. its not that its the first time, the creator of this post was complaining that only russia gets its what ifs and technicalities while china doesnt.
2 Likes
whoch i told you that what i am talking about now.
i agree with everything you named, i support the J16 buff as i main top tier china myself.
1 Like
Keep putting words in my mouth are we? But hey, “standards” i guess.
Let me put it bluntly since you can’t read. I couldn’t care less that the MiG-35 has AESA right now. I only mentioned that it doesn’t have it in real life because that fact is what makes it a “what if” aircraft. If Gaijin wanted to model it authentically, then it would be a KR with 77-1s essentially. They chose not to. That’s not my problem.
techincally every nation get a what if situation. that being weapons. but as for planes, half of it dont
which is what the creator is complaining about…
rafale f3 can carry 8 micas. does it irl? no, rafale f4 does. but also, rafale f4 technically carries 10 mica’s, not merely 8, i’m guessing they put rafale f4 for the future since its the only plane left to add to france.
china doesnt have any of this
1 Like
i am not purring anything in your mouth, ew.
you said its fake, okay good. now give it its original radar who is in service.
plane goes from good to mid35.
that called going back to original configuration.
You literally making shit up? You can’t seem to comprehend the context at all? I mentioned the MiG-35 radar as an example of a what if aircraft. I never mentioned any reverts. Examples are not the same as I want gaijin to follow my will, or are you too blind to understand this?
The Ho-ri production is an example of a fake tank. The R2Y2 is an example of a fake plane. The MiG-35 AESA radar is an example of a never used radar. This does not mean I want anything to change. They are examples that already exist in the game??
Champion of community standards here, putting words and assumptions about other people opinion then act like you’re in the right. The gall of you.
ts funny asf
1 Like
you hate it you not, there is and will be what if planes in game.
deal with it ¯\ (ツ)/¯
And where did i mention about how i’m against what ifs??? Literally breaking your own standards again. Just say you are illiterate.
Champion of community standards guys. Assume what peoples’ opinions are even if they said otherwise. Then act like you’re right all along. You’re literally the type of people you said shouldn’t be on the forums.
Buddy doesn’t know its literally a pobit, another AESA light fighter trash at 14.3 with 6 arh missiles at the same BR as the 14 missile Su-30SM
Oh and before you say “omg this is proof you hate mig-35”, Imma just say i dont care cuz im not planning to get it. Im gonna farm the people who play it. If anything they should keep it 14.3 so i can farm them easier.
your saying this ? you started all this because your eyes cant what ron writed.
go live under the assumption what you said it yourself.
gaijin being gaijin with their what if world when proof says that it has technical compatibility of carring the radar.
you know nothing then come and say this while you have 0 knowledge on plane that your are saying is a what if. know better please.
i dont mind being wrong but i know for a fact i am not here and many can prove it, funny enough someone already.
perfect exmple what i am saying. just funny to think that the plane will be equiped with a aesa when you said that its a fake. just a little tip, removing the so called fake radar will give it the Zhuk who is the Mig29KR radar. unless you think the 13,7 radar is somehow on the same level as 14.3, your wrong.
sure man i never mentioned that but sure.
Who spent the last 5-10 posts assuming I wanted to revert or change the MiG-35 again? And Ron said:
Which I never denied.
“nuh uh you’re wrong” copy paste slop. Also, there’s already a whole thread discussing about MiG-35 radar which again, wasn’t in service:
Mikoyan-Gurevich MiG-29/35 Fulcrum - History, Design, Performance & Dissection (Part 2) - Machinery of War Discussion / Aircraft - War Thunder — official forum
uh huh, in your own words.
one is mech and one is aesa. surely they are the same.
typical i swear
Bro doesn’t understand that im saying you’re slop, because all your arguments is “nuh uh you’re wrong” then backs up with literally nothing but air. Another example of assuming the person is thinking about something completely different too.
not so different slop guy.
Whole thread where people already brought up abt how MiG-35 AESA radar is not in service:
Mikoyan-Gurevich MiG-29/35 Fulcrum - History, Design, Performance & Dissection (Part 2) - Machinery of War Discussion / Aircraft - War Thunder — official forum
Where’s yours brochacho? We are not the same buddy.
Glad we can agree people with slop opinions (you) shouldn’t be dictating standards on the forums
the grass is green type of ah person.
look up in the most posted name. go ahead, i speak with them every day. not only your blind. but also you brain can translate the word technical compatibility does exist and the 9.15D is half of the body of the 9.41 and have a full 9.41 avionics intergreted.
and dont even try chit chat you uselles crap.
And if you’re so literate, have you seen where I ever denied that it was compatible? I merely pointed out that it is, again, not in service, something you seems to have particular trouble wrapping your head around?
Gee have some standards, we’re civilized after all.
which wont matter when the game is based around it.