I thought that unpainted part was showing that it’s 105/55, but according to blueprints this exact part should be a bit different, right?
PS why is it unpainted still?
I thought that unpainted part was showing that it’s 105/55, but according to blueprints this exact part should be a bit different, right?
PS why is it unpainted still?
The blueprint are from the arsenal and their plans on how they could make the 105/55.
The photo you’ve posted is from OTOMELARA, we don’t have a blueprint of their cannon.
No idea why that part is still unpainted but it matches the photos we have from when they took the tank outside.
Is it L7, its Oto variant or what?
Current historical consultant says M68, a licensed L7, coupled with the original M36 gun breach.
But at this point it doesn’t really matter much if it’s either an M68 or a L7, the point is that it’s a 105/51.
Seems like that, they probably used one from M60A1 tanks and that unpainted part seems to be hidden by mask on M60s. That’s why it’s unpainted)
Perhaps an Astra M47. I know it would be worse, but it would be better than a C&P and could probably be 7.0 instead of 7.3. IDK. What other options are there?
One that I suggested was a standard M47 but with a 105mm.
That’s basically what we have already
Need it now!!! I demand it done in the next patch!!!
What we have is a sidegrade of the M47, the one I proposed is a straight up upgrade.
You don’t compromise your mobility for the firepower.
Sure, but we already have a 105mm M47. I would like a little more variety
Other than the Astra project, there isn’t anything unique.
This BR range needs more options. So probably both. What, exactly is the 105mm one you are talking about?
Imo the OTO M47 should be 7.3 as it trades mobility for firepower.
You could have the Astra at 6.7 as the engine makes it way slower.
And have the prototype M47 with 105mm at 7.7
At 8.0 you have plenty of options: M60, Leone and Leopard1A2
I thought Italy only used the M60A1. Which we already have.
Although Italy borrowed M60A1 RISE/PASSIVE from USMC in Somalia and I would like to see that.
Definitely on board with your overall plan though.
Yeah when I said the M60 I meant the M60A1, the one we have ingame is the M60A1 of the Armored Division Ariete, like other premiums of this kind, you can introduce the normal one in the TT, like it happened with the P.40, the M43, the M26 and so on.
The M60A1(RISE) could be interesting but maybe as a squadron or event vehicle as it was used in small numbers and for a small fraction of time.
Cool. I agree completely.
I’d be down for that. I just want as much variety in lineups as possible. Vehicles in as many BR’s as possible. I also don’t care about high tier. After 9.7 Ground RB stinks. Which is why I love all these cold war recommendations as they would all be 9.7 or under.
Leopard 1A2 is here, Only one more model to go… Still want the RISE Passive.
We are in 2025 and the 3D model is still wrong…
Did you made the bug report?
Commenting here now that my suggestion for it has finally been approved — the M47 in Latrun is a domestic Israeli upgrade (M47 RKM), and not the same as the Spanish M47E2. The Italian M47 in-game is modelled based on the Israeli one.
A corrected bug report should be made with this info in mind, imo.