In fact, it is not difficult to add Spyder at all. Spyder has many configurations (such as integrating photoelectric aiming system/AESA radar/missile launcher in the same truck). Referring to the 81C already owned by Japan in the game, it can be found that the Spyder shown in the figure below has already met the requirements. Unfortunately, Gaijin is still unwilling to add a top air Defence system to Israel.
It would have only p4 and derbys for now so 11.7 at best
Lmao, you mean a truck with missiles that can only lock on to a target in good weather from 4.5 km away? And with no radar? Just don’t give the Gaijins an idea, the only thing greater than their stupidity is greed. We need to make a new anime featuring Gaijin, The Seven Deadly Sins.
After all, the introduction of new mechanics of vehicles with separate radars requires the development of new models of equipment and interface + take into account the operating range of a truck with a radar and a truck with missiles. But they only need cheap quick money, so in the game there is such a disgrace as Antelope + Tan-SAM and the lack of Datalink/LOAL in other SAMs.
First Of All, I Don’T Know If This Is More Funny Than The fact That A Tree Is Still Using 9.7Br SAM To Air Defence On The Top Br. Once again, I just provide information and ideas to solve the current dilemma faster, and refute some people who argue that it is difficult to realise Spyder to join the game.
Secondly, your sentence has basically nothing to do with Spyder. I have also sent relevant information to show that Spyder can integrate photoelectric aiming system/missile launcher/AESA radar on the same truck chassis, which is still not a technical problem. As for why I say that 81C is just an idea provided by referring to the existing content of the game, of course, Spyder with radar can be directly used.
It can lock from further away.
Palestine subtree for Israel when then?
Only on holidays in certain good weather, in any case it does not allow to realize the full range of the missile of 10 km. The absence of radar & LOAL is a very big mistake. The funniest thing is that the people responsible for the balance in the game do not play it, therefore Tan-SAM has such a combat rating. Well, and the shameful Chaparral machines of the USA and Israel, there were several reports with evidence that they (Chaparral) should capture targets from a much greater distance.
From my time playing it, lock distance was surely greater than 4.5km on average.
Great documentation! This did not come up in my research!
Fact. The Imp. Chaparral being Israel’s “top tier” SPAA Is lowering Israeli win rates in game.
I suppose it would depend on the configuration.
Land based derby’s could be quite effective.
For how we know gaijin they just gonna cp the missile
Maybe after a few updates it will get the booster
worst thing is, the machbet is much better, the chaparral missile is supposed to be smokeless (it isn’t) you can say Israel top tier spaa is 9.3.
its a disgrace
I dont think its true chaparral missile us faster and harder to dodge
machbet at least has a gun, can defend from ground targets,
and the worse thing about the chaparral is the seeker.
only the seeker itself makes the machbet so much better
The gun is hella mid its a 7.7 gun the rounds are kinda slow and it only has 40 pen so not rly great at defending yourself
I played both quite much and i find the chaparral better at taking planes
Yes the seeker is caged but if u learn how to time the lunch correctly its pretty good and nearly impossible to dodge rear aspect
And u have 12 missiles insted of 4
From what I read it’s supposed to have an uncaged seeker also, and it really needs a buff with the tracking, the thing takes forever to start tracking.
I didnt notice that
If u mean pulling then yea it needs like 1.5 sec to start pulling hard but the tracking isnt bad after u lunch it has big fov so its not losing the lock so easily
iirc, in a oversimplification between the MIM and the FIM the MIM-72 has a better FM, whilst the FIM-92 has a better seeker.
MIM-72 seems to turn better, whilst the FIM-92 can lock from further (especially noticeable against helicopters) and is extremely flare resistant, as in engine off + period countermeassures and the Fim-92 still goes straight for the engine, whilst MIM-72 is easily defeated by a single flare.
I’m pretty sure the MIM-72G is uncaged, although I only have the American Chappy, not the Israeli one.
Correct on the american but the mim 72g has stinger irccm so its nearly impossible to flare it
i thought the same that stinger is better but after i learned how to time correctly the lunch i found the chapi is better overall
