so much work for a few buffs cant wait to see the BUK M3 in the next patch just outperforming everything while we got a gimped SPAA
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
Because you’re off-topic and if people keep getting off-topic the entire thread gets locked and then no one gets the SLM buff we need and want.
1 Like
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
Free Speech? Dude you are on a game forum.
You accpeted their ToS and they can do whatever they want.
Free Speech is also only against the Government. Free speech doesn’t mean you can do what you want and write what you want.
Guys…
-
Off topic.
-
Discussing moderation in public is against the rules, if you have questions then PM a Forum Moderator.
-
Talking about review bombing isn’t allowed.
The rules are quite easy to understand and there is no “hidden agenda” behind it.
Edit:
You can read more about the flag system here: Forum Flagging System Explanation
6 Likes
sadly it seems hard to read for some people, anyway back on topic…
1 Like
Keeping on talking about off-topic still results in off-topic. Please just keep it on rails and avoid conversations that are not related to the topic at hand.
Additionally, follow this:
9 Likes
Well. I see there’s no point in arguing anymore. At this point just gotta wait what they cook up in their basement and that’s it
1 Like
yeah
1 Like
Found another Magazine that they can’t accept:
If it isn’t obvious already, they wont accept any sources that contradict their point. They just read those bug reports, laugh at them, make up some nonsense and decline it.
7 Likes
They already accepted sources. That’s why I wrote I found another one they WON’T accept since it’s a 3rd party magazine again.
Also we don’t contradict their point because they don’t have one.
They don’t know how fast the missile is, my best guess is they tuned it randomly and see how it fits and I hope they realize that this doesn’t match up with what we know for certain.
In the meantime I will continue to dig through the Internet ;)
1 Like
In the vertical dimension, the requirement was 15 km height as before. In the horizontal dimension, a range of at least 30 km had to be achieved.
The criterion of range is not the maximum flight distance, but the range of the effect. The effective range is the area in which a target can be effectively hit. This also depends on the target or the target’s ability to evade the approaching missile.
Under optimal sensor conditions, the effector technology must be able to engage targets with a probability of destruction of 75 percent in an ideal climate and 50 percent in bad weather.
The IRIS-T SL guided missile could successfully engage the targets over the entire required range, but not in all weather conditions.
The Air Force specialists did not certify the IRIS-T SL guided missile’s all-weather capability because the required 200-meter visibility was not met. In this case, the hit probability was less than 75 percent.
Diehl pointed to the field tests in South Africa, which exceeded the hit probability required by the specifications. In combination with a modern ground sensor, the guided missile has no operational restrictions due to weather phenomena.
tl;dr primary source (Swiss), EFFECTIVE range needs to be AT LEAST 30km horizontal and 15km vertical (meaning a target at that range and altitude has to be hit) while in-game it’s what? 10 by 5km’s currently? Lol.
16 Likes
They accept sources they want to accept. It’s good that you are trying to find more proof that they just invented random numbers and decided to slap them onto stats hoping community accepts it. But don’t get your hopes too high thinking that with even reliable sources you will accomplish something
so are we just gona make a new bugreport? i feel like, and i have stated that alo over the past few days, they are just set on not making it good, and as Necronomica already mentioned ( while it is dumb as hell) a effective range for the mods COULD just mean the range at wich you shoot the target while its flying at you, while i think its dumb, we have to take into consideration that most mods on the issue tracker seem to be… well not qualified clearly and they love making up excuses
if we had it WRITTEN down so that they couldnt talk themselfs out of it that the target did STAY at 30km and flew in an orbit that would be amazing
Why make a new report XD?? There’s already tons of them. And each one of them says the same “not enough info”. They will just look into that new, not answer it, close it and call it a day while scratching balls and thinking they did a good job
can you just hate gaijin in reddit,youtube or somewhere ? so we can actually use this forum for fixing stuff ?
5 Likes
since its a new source, also in hopes that another mod looks at it who might actualy read the docs instead of just aiming to close the report
(if your report gets accepted or not feels like it depends on the mood of whoever is looking at it)
Tbh I don’t care much for it. I play WT maybe once every few weeks lol. I’m just here to show that Gaijin ALSO doesn’t give a care in the world for “accuracy” of things they implement considering most incoming threats tend to be much slower than the interceptors fired at them, so even if the “30km range” is indeed when the missile’s fired at a target, said target would’ve maybe traveled at most 10km’s (but likely less considering the flight speed of the SL interceptor) by the time the missile flies up to it and is capable of actually hitting - which is STILL vastly beyond what we have now. I’ve seen test videos of the SLM, and it is basically useless against manouvering targets beyond 10km’s haha.
Also, IMO, it just shows the missile has to be faster than M2.0 that Gaijin coped out of nowhere. Considering the BAAINBw itself states the MAX range is 50km’s, whereas in WT it’s about 25km’s instead…
If the Federal Office of Bundeswehr Equipment, Information Technology and In-Service Support isn’t a primary source for Gaijin, then I dunno what else can be. They’re just hell-bent on not fixing the SLM the same way they haven’t done anything about fixing the 2A7V.
7 Likes