Iris-t slm

excuse me, wtf…


https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/Fg7rtuUqpiAY

3 Likes

Guess you have to re-report with a video of the contact disappearing the moment the helicopter gets within 500m at a higher altitude. (Unless the screenshot was of an attached video demonstrating exactly that, and the bug report manager is just dumb)

Dont you know the IRIS-T SLM lives under a rock and has never seen the sky and is blinded by the light of Gaijin

I would say thats pretty low, no?

1 Like

what kind of bullshit is that

yep, thats the funny stuff which is going on with 60% of the SLM reports XD

im convinced they are told to reject anything in favor of the new AA systems without making it too obvious
(its still obvious)

what a shitshow it will be when they add the S300 and it will be the new next OP thing

2 Likes

i cant shake my feelings that not our sources isnt good enough
but is they refuse to believe and just hate German stuff ==

They very likely wouldn’t, which is what Gaijin is counting on with demanding primary sources for something that entered service in 2022.

what how its related to bug report?

@Smin1080p_WT Good to know Diehl and Intracom Defense are now a third party source tbh (both are producers of equipment for the system LMAO). Might be worth looking into who this tech mod is, cus he’s been rejecting pretty much every single report on the SLM for the dumbest of reasons. At this point this has to be deliberate and not just “tehe, sorry misread”.

33 Likes

it’s just malicious at this point

2 Likes

I wouldn’t mind as much if they didn’t immediately lock the comments, so you can’t refute any errors they made in their assessment. Even just 24 hours of extra comment time would be sufficient.

That used to be the case on the old forum actually, but since the switch to this new separate website, and the making of mods anonymous, they just close reports for whatever reason and don’t allow you to correct their mistakes.

Atp they’re on an actual power trip haha.

At least he gave us a clear sign that the Pantsir is wrong.

“A land-based missile by definition cannot have such high starting speed”

Apparently no ground launched missile can ever go over Mach 2 then. So let’s report the VT-1 and Pantsir Missile as well as the Starstreaks.

I have no words anymore… By definition?! Does he know that the rockets used to fly to space also are in fact ground launched? How fast does he think Spaceshuttles went? I guess planes also can’t reach speeds higher than Mach 2 then. Man this guy whoever it is, is really unnerving…

15 Likes

This is why anonymous tech mods just makes the whole system worse by lowering the bar for actual moderation, and makes the whole system free of consequences for poor performance.

The old system was better, knowning who your mods were built trust in the community, this is a blunder on par with marketing lies.

If the whole making tech mods anonymous was because of doxxing, then it’s on Gaijin for not protecting the privacy of their employees.

10 Likes

The inconsistency against Munitions is a different issue that became more clear after the changes that came, after this report was created;

https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/P4QHwv1Swvnn

3 Likes

is there noone that can be contacted in such cases?, this does just feel like a powertrip of a single ( or few ) mods

just like this


someone going around rejecting everything until another mod actualy has a look at it
(Community Bug Reporting System)

12 Likes

Allready done, waiting for answer

4 Likes

You’re reading it wrong, he’s saying “starting speed”. not max speed.

It would be quite interesting to see a land vehicle going mach 1 before launching a missile XD

So the exact same missile launched at mach one and going up to mach 3 cannot be compared to being launched from a stationary starting point. Mach 2 for the SLS seems reasonable and is what i have seen from most sources.

2 Likes