Chinese players share the same demands as all other players,Solve the same issues facing players across all national tech trees:
Implement long-delayed approved issues and correct obvious errors.
Make the issue review process transparent, assigning responsibility for NAB issues to specific individuals, and trace the responsibility for any unreasonable NAB issues back to the responsible individuals.
Address specific issues raised by players head-on, rather than evading them.
What the hell, all we want is for Chinese vehicles to get some proper attention and respect. How did Singapore even get dragged into this? Looks to me like Gaijin is just trying to deflect.
If at all, they should start by adding the already existing vehicles that china has and for the love of god model their top tier tanks properly. It is already proven that the reload rates and armor of the 99A (and its prototype) and VT4 are incorrect.
While this is the “grass is greener on the other side mentality”, a chunk of said players will always whine about ‘blunt’ announcements, especially in this scenario.
What gaijin needed to do here was answer the Yes or No question for the Thai VT-4, and in doing so, that chunk of players would make a big fuss over it, but it would be the right thing to do.
Instead gaijin chose to try and appease all parties involved by not addressing the Y/N question, and instead baiting with the announcement of new subtrees.
TLDR - Gaijin will keep dodging difficult questions and topics, because they don’t want to anger that 10%, and in doing so, they pissed off a far larger proportion of players
You may not know the thinkin
g logic of East Asia. Every coun
try is afraid or jealous of Chin
a, but once they can gain the s
tatus of China, similar to the Qi
ng Dynasty, they will think the
y are China.So, meybe gajing can add all them to one tree
Singapore to chinese seems so unecessary as it contradicts their whole point. China and Taiwan which share one techtree have an absolute mega ton of vehicles missing, the Taiwanese Abrams is just one example. Even the recent military parade showed a bunch of tanks and IFVs they could still add.
In Air AB the F-86F-25 is a subsonic jet fighter armed with 6x .50’s with a BR 7.7 aircraft, by adding 4 cannons to it - you get the the F-86F-2 - that somehow jumps to 9.0. Meanwhile - Russia’s tree has 3 MiG-21’s that are 8.7 or 9.0 BR - all of them Supersonic, all of them capable of using missiles, 1 of them even Radar missiles, and I believe 2 of them use an autocannon not terribly dissimilar to the F-104’s (especially after the nerf that I can’t find a single source that validates it) - which that F-104 as well is 9.7 with 2-4 AIM-9B’s. The F-105A has AIM-9E’s, the F-111A is stuck with B’s even though it actually was flying when other models of Sidewinders were becoming the norm and as the 105’s were being phased out. Which the increase in BR to the 105 was a joke as well - but all that is also issues not really seen with similar Russian aircraft. There’s a ton more with aircraft, before we even get in to ships, tanks, or the recent blowout panel changes - that make it seem heavily like there is a bias, cause things like that F-86 being at that rank when you compare it to other aircraft both in it’s tree, let alone the MiG’s - makes no sense. Maybe if you guys were more transparent with how BR is determined - to make some of this make sense, it wouldn’t be - but as is, they don’t and seem to favour certain vehicles of certain nations.
Aside from changes like bringing the F-104’s down to 9.3 or the cannon armed F-86 to 8.3 or 8.7 for things like balance - as a long time player, much as I’ve taken some breaks, who actually attempts to play all the nations and types: please, for crying out loud, increase the EXP we get or decrease the cost at high tiers by half of at least planes and especially tanks. I got the whole US air tree, minus the newest addition, unlocked - but 5 battles of the bonus XP, especially if I have bad ones cause hey, it happens, doesn’t put a dent in the 29 aircraft - not including the ones in folders - I have to research for Germany still, or any of the other nations that have similar or less work done. Let alone what for me is a soul-crushing grind with German tanks being the farthest along at Rank 5/starting 6 to try and get that done to have a bonus for all the other nations - and more of a reason to use the squadron vehicle I unlocked. Forget the usually relatively easy to get through low tiers of 1-3, from 6-8, let alone 4-8 I probably have a few hundred vehicles to unlock without even getting to the folder ones and it’s demoralizing at times to look and feel like I’m never gonna get to them, even after 10+ years of playing cause I’ve forgotten how long it’s been - other than long enough to remember when some of the bigger nations now like US had what would better be described as tech twigs with maybe 2-3 lines of aircraft, and maybe 4 nations total I’m not sure Japan had even been added yet when I started. Though making event vehicles premiums could help too.
I’d like to conduct a survey: Among all the players commenting here, how many of you have actually completed the entire Chinese tech tree? (Meaning you’ve used basically every vehicle)
Just a few days ago, most players didn’t oppose when the VT4 was added to the Japanese tech tree. So, why is there opposition to Singapore being added to the Chinese tech tree? After all, it’s just a game, right? But actually, I’d prefer it if Gaijin would fix the errors and biases in the Chinese tech tree and add more interesting domestic vehicles, rather than relying on foreign tanks to gain an advantage. We actually have better ones of our own.–From translation