Leopard 2A4 Procaco is essentially the 2A4 on drugs (New Thermals, LWS, possibly more armour, APS + more modern round)
Leopard 2A4 MCS is basically the 2A4 but with “Multispectral Cloak” (not sure how it’d perform in game, likely overperform looking at DIRCM)
M-50 HVMS “Super Sherman” (M-51 with 60mm HVMS Autocannon)
M-51 “Proyecto-T” - Modernised M-51 with better armour, engine, LRF
Leopard 1V (Modified from Dutch, has spaced armour, NVD, APFSDS-T (Hetz-7), ATGM (LAHAT)
I didnt manage to even find a description of that modernization, but is sounds as the ztz-99-2 or ztz-99-3 except the reverse speed
OOOF, looks cool. Unusable, but cool
so, the 2a4 with a new shot, does not sound to me as not clone tho
HAH! Well, that one really does look funny! that one i definetly would like to see ingame, even if it practically a clone
does it?! I read that it utilizes the same cannon as the HVG, so no autoloaded there is. But if it DOES, and the game would make it the “casette” loading… Wow!
the 105mm ATGM? Didnt know that L7 could use it
Oh, yeah, you are right, totaly forgot about that one
Oh you are right, I forgot about some of the, didnt know Prendergast was Canadian and forgot about Skink (and hopefully I will forget about it again with how much I dislike it especially at its current BR), I was writing it purely from memory so I forgot about some of them.
B will be the answer.
1 Like
The best and real one.
All of these examples were added before the Idea of Sub-Trees. Just to be clear.
True. Is just GAIJIN try to distract you guys and me Thai player catches the stray bullets from this BS. I just want to play with Thai line up 😭
1 Like
T 80U certainly was not, it was added at the same update as finland.
1 Like
T 80U is also a trialed vehicle and not really a good choice for an argument about subtrees especially when none of the Swedish subtrees looked at it aside from the main nation itself.
Best examples would’ve been the Finnish Vehicles on Germany and the SA Vehicle on Germany as both came before the addition of subtrees.
2 Likes
They have already deleted every possible counter-post.
This is how Gaijin treat their players…
There’s a few, we actually have one of them in game already! (The Falrick 105 ATGM on the CV90105 XC-8, & CT-CV 105HP)
And if I recall, The T 80U was not trialed by Finland, but by Sweden, therefore irrelevant to the Sub Tree question. I still think it is a ridiculous that Sweden has it though, and I will agree on that. But this is aside the point.
1 Like
While yes, it certainly was added after the idea of subtrees, as you described it.
2 Likes
ZTZ-96B ~ already suggested
ZBD-03 airborne ifv and it has variable suspension and can equip HJ atgms
ZBD86A
ZBL-08 ifv
2 Likes
Soviet weaponry doesn’t over-perform over other tech trees.
To be fair none of the swedish players wanted it when gaijin could’ve added a unique Finnish Patria in its place
my honest opinion singapore should go to israel both countries have really good relations the armed forces of singapore were trained by the FDIs singapore armed forces have literally a similar if not the same doctrine as the FDI, singapore even produce under license and use the SAR-21 which is literally the cousin of the TAR-21 rifle which is produced in israel (both are bullpup rifles), israel sent a lot of help to singapore, vehicles, armament, technology, components, training, air defences and we cant leave out the fact that the independence of singapore was declared with the help of israel both countries are really close, japan already got a subtree and it would even get indonesia as stated, soo… singapore should go to israel or UK but UK got india and there is a lot of commonwealth vehicles missing too and now it got australian and canadian vehicles soo… i dont see how singapore could go to britain since it have a lot of vehicles, singapore its a perfect subtree for israel because there is a lot of space in the israeli tree to not leave a single singaporean vehicle out of the game also all the singaporean comrades would be very well welcome in our tree.
5 Likes