Information Regarding the Thai Subtree and Chinese Vehicles

[Lord_Prism]

So uh, where’s the Thai VT4? A lotta words for nothing of substance

[玩偶姐姐]

Copying data should mean copying it faithfully, not doing so and then illogically buffing its weaknesses. The entire Chinese community knows that the autoloader on the VT4 tank exported to Thailand is protected by the main armor belt

[AquaUselessGod]

I’m not going to remain chill anymore, I’ve tried my best to be as reasonable and calm as I possibly could whenever the topic about Singapore going to China is brought up.

However, today as a Singaporean, I absolutely despise Gaijin for such an absolute nonce of a decision, this is unacceptable even for me and if this goes through, I will stop playing this game with immediate effect. Gaijin, this is your ONLY chance to listen and revert course.

[Javelin84220]

A bunch of nonsense. Since you know where the problem lies, what you need now is a solution rather than a bunch of nonsense

[Godvana]

Singapore should ABSOLUTELY NOT go to China.

There are other better options for Chinese sub-trees and Singapore is not one of them.

[dotSHINI]

@magazine2

A small reminder that you can always leave ideas, questions and suggestions on our forum. We look through everything carefully. Don’t forget to report any bugs or inaccuracies on the Community Bug Reporting platform.

Reads like a lot of nothing,

I am still waiting for the promised Leopard DM rework, that never happend.

@Stona_WT

In the near future, we will update the DM for Leopard 2 tanks, therefore correcting any minor discrepancies.

[Deathmisser]

@magazine2

Singapore for China. This does not mean that all of our current ideas will necessarily be implemented. Within the team, we’re constantly thinking about and discussing various vehicles that would be nice additions to the game until we find an optimal solution.

You dare do this and it’s the end of the world, a benight solution it’s the end of civilization as we know it. What’s next Serbian tech with Russia ?

[BiasedThunderツ]

Gaijin please, first focus on filling every possible gap with Unique Chinese vehicles that are still missing ingame, and other Pakistani & Taiwanese Vehicles before giving China a 3rd “Subtree” only for the sake of copy pasting another leopard 2, SAMPT and a few other stuff, we already know your solely reason of wanting to add SG to China is to add more copypaste slop that takes the very least effort to model. This isnt a healthy practice and will only bring more and more politics discussion into the game.

[John_Sneeeeeeeew]

@magazine2

Singapore for China.

Terrible idea.

[ueberman]

Singapore to China, are you for real?

[_Woe]

@magazine2

How do you decide which trees and subtrees to add to the game and how to distribute the vehicles within them?

Really seems like your primary concern is always “what can we add that has the most copy/paste”

I also think you should stop adding western vehicles to RU/China and vice versa.

Whats the point of having nation TTs at all if you have both types of vehicles in 1 lineup.
The more unique the vehicles feel and the TTs are, the better the game is.

[Caernarvon02]

This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.

[themadseventeen]

@magazine2

This is as long as the changes don’t contradict the principles of realism we want to maintain in the game, however.

Remember when you let realism be decided by a community vote? I remember.

Following the Roadmap: Voting to Test our Proposed APHE Shell Changes

[image] Today, we’ll be talking about changes to the post-pen effects for APHE shells used by ground vehicles that we plan to introduce into the game. We’re ready to show you what we have planned here, and at the end of this news post you can participate in voting for or against — whether there’ll be changes or not all depends on your vote. Let’s take a look! Preserving fragments in the head part of the shell First off, we’d like to tell you abou…

Stop pretending to be about realism if you are only going to apply it selectively when it suits you.

[Kingtiez-live]

Leopard 2SG would be pretty cool

[Apollo_1641]

Before the community post only the Chinese community was upset

Now everyone is upset

🙃

[Sex-Bad]

this has nothing to do with the actual conversation going on
it’s damage control speaking around everything at hand

[Beeschurger]

Honestly more I read this response its completly missing the point. Instead of calming things down or giving some sort of timeframe for final decision, its the usual corpo speak that gives no real answer and it just pours more oil into the fire.

“Oh we hear your concerns about thai VT-4 so were considering to add singapore to the chinese TT”

[AquaUselessGod]

Guys I want you guys to remember, Gaijin wants to add Singapore to China, and we use French, British, American, German and Israeli equipments, so China is effectively getting:

American: M551, F-35A, F-35B, F-15SG, F-16C/D, F-5S, A-4SU, M113
British: Hunter F.74
French: AMX-13, SAMP/T, AMX-10P, AMX-10P (90mm)
Israeli: Hunter AFV, AMX-13 SM-1, F-16D+, SPYDER
German: Leopard 2A4, Leopard 2SG

Oh and Gaijin, thank you for once again proving the leakers right for the umpteenth time

Edit: I got so angry I forgot the Leopard 2s

[玩偶姐姐]

Please provide the photos or videos showing the T-84 using BTA-4 and GP125. There are no available sources indicating that the T-84 is capable of employing these rounds

Furthermore, the Issues section needs a complete overhaul. It cannot be left in a state where moderators apply labels based on their own arbitrary judgment, and where reports for Chinese vehicles are consistently sidelined, taking years to be implemented—if they ever are. We genuinely hope to end the widespread saying: “Passed ≠ Implemented”

[TennoOwO]

I have nothing to talk with a robot.