I don’t think this is needed. China has so many domestic vehicles that could be added instead
194 Likes
I think people would be less harsh on the bug reporting if there weren’t major year old or more bug reports that haven’t been added, such as reduced engine smoke for the Harriers, or Chinese MBT spall liners. One of these is a single value, the other is a massive survivability reduction that an entire nation has to deal with.
Also, a lot of mods seem to be not that good. See “we believe this to be a marketing lie.”
102 Likes
Exactly. China has a ton of domestic high tier vehicles that can be added, and if it does get a subtree, it should be Pakistan or N Korea.
83 Likes
So Chinese Leopard 2 SG, F-15SG, F-35B, and other vehicles which have absolutely no relation to China.
Do you realise how out of touch that is?
207 Likes
not a bug
65 Likes
I’d rather see domestic, Pakistani, and Bangladeshi vehicles for China. Singapore is not needed as it just makes things more awkward. We already have a western touch through Taiwan (which we’ll likely get an Abrams).
62 Likes
As was true when the leak happened; Singapore is a dreadful add for China, and is far more suited to Japan (Squadron vehicle?) who struggle far more for major ground equipment.
Add PRC and ROC vehicles, Pakistan and the DPRK are great subtrees for China and can contribute plenty of unique and fun equipment.
48 Likes
*except thai players
tbh gaijins PR is lacking lately. From bug reports (bugs that are being sat on for years, Trophy not working) to handling the thai VT-4 situation (which was literally not adressed directly by this post).
48 Likes
This makes no logical sense in any way shape or form. This should NOT be implemented.
106 Likes
So uh, where’s the Thai VT4? A lotta words for nothing of substance
40 Likes
Copying data should mean copying it faithfully, not doing so and then illogically buffing its weaknesses. The entire Chinese community knows that the autoloader on the VT4 tank exported to Thailand is protected by the main armor belt
24 Likes
I’m not going to remain chill anymore, I’ve tried my best to be as reasonable and calm as I possibly could whenever the topic about Singapore going to China is brought up.
However, today as a Singaporean, I absolutely despise Gaijin for such an absolute nonce of a decision, this is unacceptable even for me and if this goes through, I will stop playing this game with immediate effect. Gaijin, this is your ONLY chance to listen and revert course.
154 Likes
A bunch of nonsense. Since you know where the problem lies, what you need now is a solution rather than a bunch of nonsense
28 Likes
Singapore should ABSOLUTELY NOT go to China.
There are other better options for Chinese sub-trees and Singapore is not one of them.
103 Likes
Reads like a lot of nothing,
I am still waiting for the promised Leopard DM rework, that never happend.
25 Likes
You dare do this and it’s the end of the world, a benight solution it’s the end of civilization as we know it. What’s next Serbian tech with Russia ?
20 Likes
Gaijin please, first focus on filling every possible gap with Unique Chinese vehicles that are still missing ingame, and other Pakistani & Taiwanese Vehicles before giving China a 3rd “Subtree” only for the sake of copy pasting another leopard 2, SAMPT and a few other stuff, we already know your solely reason of wanting to add SG to China is to add more copypaste slop that takes the very least effort to model. This isnt a healthy practice and will only bring more and more politics discussion into the game.
52 Likes
Terrible idea.
67 Likes
Singapore to China, are you for real?
55 Likes
Really seems like your primary concern is always “what can we add that has the most copy/paste”
I also think you should stop adding western vehicles to RU/China and vice versa.
Whats the point of having nation TTs at all if you have both types of vehicles in 1 lineup.
The more unique the vehicles feel and the TTs are, the better the game is.
24 Likes