Hull Armor of the M1 Abrams

Another great christmas gift from gaijin. A shafted nation with little to no protection, hey might as well change the abrams from an MBT class to light tank right?

17 Likes

Gajin loves sweden

Are you seriously suggesting the U.S. and DoD is incapable of upgrading the M1s suspension?

3 Likes

Yet the only thing you have done is ignore all the proof that the suspensions were improved. Again, only noise from you. You’re ignorant, apparently on purpose.

We’ve shown documents explaining and showing the suspension upgrades, and that weight management was always a part of the Abrams program. You’d add more support in the front if you’re putting DU in the hull. Which has also been documented.

Your tired mental gymnastics don’t change reality. The Abrams received DU in the hull, and it’s had upgrades to its suspension and weight reduction efforts throughout the course of its continuing service and development. I’m sorry the American tanks are better than you would like them to be, and better than how Gaijin is willing to represent them in their “realistic” game. I hope you can find a way to cope that is less exhausting for everyone else you encounter.

21 Likes

Whats crazy is these guys don’t understand the SEP programme was literally designed for SURVIVABILITY and TECHNOLOGICAL improvement, I mean what else is there to say>

13 Likes

It’s obvious that these people trying to dismiss the Sep programs having better armor is to maintain their current top tier fantasy meta tanks. Can’t have the U.S. being top dog now can we?

8 Likes

Its funny you mention that because 90% of the abrams kill shots wouldnt oneshot it, if it had its spall line protection

8 Likes

They don’t want to accept information so I have been banned from bug reporting.

FlrHFri.png (1400×404) (imgur.com)

THANKS GAIJIN

Makes me reconsider how much I really want to play this game.

23 Likes

Has there been any response from Gaijin about how they’re blatantly wrong about the Abrams?

6 Likes

Nope! I am seeing Euros whining about people demanding changes for the Abrams, but Gaijin hasn’t even announced their flawed reasoning for the other tanks yet.

I might be more sympathetic if the Leo mains didn’t kneecap the Abrams efforts in the past. Now we have to deal with “MUH 5 HULLS” because they were upset about the Abrams getting better armor.

14 Likes

they don’t care about facts/logic , only " beliefs "

Thats what they always do. This is why i tell anyone on forums to start flagging these p.o.s posts like they do ours.

3 Likes

Well, we should realize that ultimately we have to defeat Gaijin. We can disprove all of their claims, but getting them to accept it is what we should focus on. Let the other mains work to prove their stuff. Let’s focus on our effort.

8 Likes

What are you even talking about? I’ve trashed all of their arguments already XD

Suspension was updated.
Weight of DU armor wasn’t that much of a hustle.
They used outdated source.
Physics and money confirm the use of this armor inside the hull of the tank.

24 Likes

Oh, I know. Gaijin’s arguments were debunked before they even posted them. But we have to get them to accept it. Our struggle is with Gaijin, not other players.

We’ll see if @Stona_WT can give us a candid and genuine response into our evidence that debunks their assertions.

20 Likes

Oh my god.

Yeah. My post that owned a guy and had 8 hearts got removed by “community flagging”. Its insane. And if you get flagged enough, you get auto muted for like 4-5 days until they “review” you. And sometimes the mute continues or is a ban

2 Likes

Good luck with that, they’d probably punch themselves before they can admit they’re wrong. Because it’s most probably intentional.

9 Likes

MBT-70, all T/X-series, ADATS, AGS, LOSAT, XM-8, HSTV-L can agree with ur take.

5 Likes

Where’d you see that?