No, I’m not thinking of someone else. Get off your high horse and take the blame for once. “To err is human” they say.
You did it here two or three times already
No, I didn’t. Someone protected 2S38 from my criticism that it’s not anywhere close to HSTVL [an 11.3 light tank, meaning 2S38 is not 11.0 capable, with the option of not close to 11.0 in capability].
No where did I say anything other than that.
Where have you criticized the 2S38 in this topic?
2S38 is inferior
This?
EDIT:
No where did I say anything other than that.
You haven’t directed it towards me but you have to few others
(@)Iluminas
Your post defending 2S38 and Russia
Now read the full post; their post was comparing 2S38 to HSTVL.
And all I stated was 2S38 is inferior to HSTVL.
I didn’t say it was inferior to Puma, BMP-2M, Desert Warrior, etc.
All I stated is that 2S38 is inferior to HSTVL, which is true.
You cannot make a tank like HSTVL that costs as much as the 2S38 costs, you won’t get sales [and 2S38 still doesn’t have sales despite being rather affordable].
HSTVL will be the highest BR auto-cannon light tank cause no other country was dumb enough to build a modern 32.365hp/t light tank with a 76mm auto-cannon.
Give the 2S38 a 680hp engine and a round that pens a bit more and yep, that can go to 11.3, but Russia ain’t making a 680hp 2S38 and they aren’t making a better APFSDS round.
2 Likes
I hope Gaijin could add the other one with 60 rounds, 26 rounds to take APFSDS and HEVT is too short
Wait, hold up…that exists?
Now that’s a good critic post, credit is where credit is due
Inferior? Yes it is but not by a long shot
Comparing it to something like Begleit, 2S38 obviously has advantage thanks to APFSDS
One thing to consider is that 2S38 has higher pen per the diameter of shell
2S38s APFSDS is faster just ever so slightly
does it also aquired IRST？
Yes, you can check the old forum, someone found that in a museum.
2 Likes
RDF LT the ‘Production’ HSTVL
1 Like
It is implied that these 60 rounds are all ready storage, which is quite insane. Maybe it’s possible due to space savings from the cased-telescoped ammunition and clever design.
“The 75 mm APFSDS-T round is designated the XM885 and has armour penetration characteristics equivalent to the 105 mm APFSDS M774”
Man, I wish
1 Like
now it is actually worth the BR but you all keep in mind you can carry only 26 shots so you really need to count your shooting and aiming for these Aircrafts
Im pretty surw the rdflt is jist bigger lol and has different ergonomics while the hstvl used extreme angles and a power engine the rdflt didn’t hell… im pretty sure the 75mm ares had an even faster fr then the hstvl version
Only really need to bring a few he vt any how as tbh 75mm proxy would kinda murder helis
hey, i remeber that you said HSTV shouldnt get a HE-VT because it’s a big nerf, as what you said, now i wanna suggest that change HSTV’s BR to 11.0, cause the nerf is already been implemented
1 Like
Weird of you to claim 2S38 is fine at 10.0.
Why do you think 2S38 is worth of staying at 10.0?
Since you claim its 1.0 difference vehicle is 11.0 capable.
hey, i remeber that you said HSTV shouldnt get a HE-VT because it’s a big nerf, as what you said, now i wanna suggest that change HSTV’s BR to 11.0, cause the nerf is already been implemented
not even a word about 2S38, this post is about HSTV-L
Is it you, the one called yourself 2S38 hater, should leave
Hmm, nope…
Do not see any mention of 2S38 in their post
He connected other-topic posts so I connected his other-topic posts, simple as.
We both know what the each is talking about, the difference is I acknowledge mine was about player behavior.
The same reason 2S38 is 10.0 because of player behavior.