I would guess ~ 4.0-4.3, depending on the gun’s traverse limits (e.g only three guns on a broadside), as that would change how she would engage.
She would outgun anything at that BR naturally, but with no armour, a bluewater damage profile, and a large amount of crew I don’t think she can go any lower. She’s also not that fast compared to most destroyers, so that also has to be kept in mind.
Im annoyed that the white star line scrapped her, she was the last of her class as Titanic and Britanic both went down. Would have been a wonderful museum about herself and her sister ships
+1 as a really weird naval addition. As long as her primary way to cause damage is via ramming like when HMS Hawke crashed into the Olympic
+1 for a Titanic class ship. A mf said he wants Jack and Rose on the front (probably to goon to) but maybe a user camo of the Titanic could have Jack and Rose on the prow/bow as figureheads (for that one guy to goon to)
Would likely be more survivable then you think. For her size she would have low amount of crew and they will be hiding in a few locations. No armour will be best armour. In one side out the other. This ship will be one big empty box.
Would be fun to see just to help noobs to understand large ship handling at low tier.
Bombs and underwater explosions are going to be her weakest link
She had some improvements to that area after her sister went down. More coal bunkers and double hull to act as reserve. All that coal might eat a round or two. Also in theory her compartments would provide lots of flood space.
I will find the video concerning her post Titanic improvements.
It will be interesting to see a civilian luxury ship that was converted to a military transport ship with few defensive guns. How many civillian will WT put on this ship?
now thats a conspirasy i dont believe as their layouts were different such as an enclosed ganway/promenade on titanic and different positions of portholes. plus Titanic had visable warping from a coal fire which olympic didnt