This guy made a good point
Thought the same. Others have none at all. But Russia already well stacked with these.
should i be expecting to only be seeing the Hummel in terms of ww2 content?
EDIT: Forgot about that stupid looking german prop…the Fw 189C I think?
honestly ya’ll should go for it. i mean you got the senrai maidens now, so something could be cooked up. looking at the current cinema landscape, more user/viewer friendly stuff made by online communities like “Iron lung” or the new “Backrooms” or even the amazing digital circus makes me believe if you guys made something along the lines of movie or tv series it could maybe potentially get good. i mean you guys have show over and over again that your cinematography sector is very talented and even non warthunder people have said that the trailers are very well made. obviously you dont have too but let it be known that the audience DOES exist
YES pls i will sell my soul to the snail for it
Why not? Still a cool ship
I just want Swedish ships…
would love to see a Nord Griffon II, with only 2x Defa 30mm and 2x Magic-1 (as per Mirage 3C standard)
but this won’t happen either.
Looking at the Yak-130 : this beast would be fairly better than most 11.7, so i hopes it gets to 12.3/12.7.
and the M-346 is better due to better weaponnary → 12.7/13.0?!
Yay the voodoo is getting added, here’s hoping their adding both the F-101-B along with the F-101-A.
I am not sure if you and the other guys have realized that gaijin’s damage model philosophy makes heavily armoured aircraft pointless. So the irl stories of flying tanks (like the Il-2s) resistent vs 20 mm shells simply don’t work in wt as long as even 7,7mm LMGs rips of their tails.
Besides that - the FW 189s were famous for their ultra-high survival rates vs USSR fighters - the armour of the 189 C kills the turn and agility advantage without any doubt.
Blockquote Oh no, 0.1s faster reload
“One second less makes Japan’s TKX a top-tier beast, but one second more suddenly makes your T-80 a piece of junk.”
Yes it was Tragedy of unseen proportions.
No one said TKX is a top tier beast.
You’re here complaining about a 0.1s reduction is reload speed like it’s something important.
Is france going to get the martlets or exocet for the super entendard finally?
Let’s take a look at the test server. BVVD probably won’t give Leopard 2A7A1. It’s already quite good to give Leopard 2A6M
T-72/90,T-80/64 reload deductions did not give significant difference, at best reload your still at the same speed as a merkava
Isn’t the T-80 a top-tier beast?
If one second doesn’t make a difference, then why not keep it at 7 seconds?? So much concern for something that’s supposedly insignificant.
No, but it’s good. Point being ?
It’s 0.1s, not 1s.
Yes, which is why I’m curious why are you bringing up something so insignificant.
Pretty sure A+ is just the A upgraded to the B standard. the is the A and B (upgrade) that are A/Bs upgraded with D avionics, but the old engines. I think if there is going to be a premium Tomcat the (upgrade) would be a good candidate, it would have the same weapons as the D, but a bit worse flight preformance.
The F-14D 100% should be TT.
Blockquote It’s 0.1s, not 1s.
all T-80s had a 7-second reload. Now they have a 6-second reload
Blockquote Yes, which is why I’m curious why are you bringing up something so insignificant.
We’re talking about 1 whole second, not 1 millisecond. You didn’t understand
