Wasn’t even in the trailer was only added after backlash
This would be a better event vehicle and it would add a new playstyle to the US tech tree or any other tank minus a copy paste with little change
2 Likes
And… they still added one…
Just like Turm3 was literally advertised to have a 3-axis stab, while they knew it was a lie.
False marketing is illegal in EU btw.
Ah, yes. The AGS just doesn’t exist i guess.
Hey be nice, they might add the ZSU-57-2M in 2036 as a 100k per stage event
Yeah they added it with terrible mobility so unless you like being unable to drive up hills its not worth the resources to add it
4 Likes
Oh yeah i know.
Just admiring the infinite wisdom of the devteam.
theres been the EFV, Marut and Israeli Meteor in the last year.
All were really really trash
1 Like
small vehicle = bad in mobility type shi
“Gaijin look out! a non-Russian event vehicle is behind you!”
object 640 still waiting
1 Like
More like terribly implemented vehicle and we don’t care about fixing it
1 Like
its never going to change
You’re right
Can it be?! Another OP russian vehicle?
Can it not be another Russian vehicle?
2 Likes
Most unique and wanted event vehicle ever. Im sure 95% of the players you pick this over any 140mm or 130mm western counterpart to Obj 292 kek
Its getting obvious where is Gaijin going with the current psyop by adding even another Russian vehicle in the span of the last three months, after the MiG-25.
And both Terminators.
And the Su-30SM2.
And the BMD with the T-72B3A before them.
I’m ready to call whatever bs people is ready to roll around this overly generous dripfeed.
1 Like
Well at least the IRL performance doesnt come close to the in-game performance.
Yeah, the fact that only after a month of release (when the research bonuses becomes active, therefore less chance of GE spending for Gaijin) the BMP-T got really raised in BR truly proves you’re right. /s
And even then, 11.3 is a damn joke, as it’s still objectively better than most of its BR peers.
1 Like