This addition is consistent with the guidelines we have set out and what I have reposted multiple times in this very thread. It doesn’t change any rule.
Sounds like:
“I am out of arguments, so shut up, or be banned.”
Ain’t it?
1 Like
Tell me how a Ukrainian Abrams or leopard in the Russian tech tree connects to an Iranian F-14 in the American tech tree
1 Like
These countries are in approximately equal relations with each other.
How does it connect in war thunder, ya know, the game this forum and discussion is about
1 Like
You provided zero arguments so far tho.
3 Likes
Better you answer me, how is this connected with logic?
Us aircraft goes to Us tech tree, cope harder
Stop deflecting and answer me now
3 Likes
I do - you just neglect them.
If US want Iranian F-14, because they sell it to IIAF - they can have only IIAF version, without all this juicy stuff.
If we want F90, Sedjil, R-27 etc., someone other must take this Tomcat. Because Islamic Republic of Iran isn’t in a good relationship with US (Diplomatical awkwardness? Nah, ain’t hear.).
So, as me, we can set it to any country, which is in good relationship with Iran.
This is:
Italy (because have Turkey as subtree, and Turkey is in good relationships with Iran).
USSR/RF, for same reason, but without intermediaries. Like Syrian TURMS-T (Soviets ain’t have Syria’s subtree, but still have this tank with Italian FCS).
China (one of biggest importer of Iranian oil).
So… I prefer Italy.
1 Like
I am not here to argue. Just provide the facts as they are.
However when someone is repeatedly spamming in an off topic direction because they disagree with the facts, that’s not something that’s ok to carry on.
It’s entirely fine to disagree and voice your opinion. Going down the spam route isn’t going to change anything or help get your point across any louder.
4 Likes
It’s not US planes, from the moment, when it been sold to Iran.
US can have IIAF Tomcat (which a copypaste), but not the IRIAF ones (Iranians been forced to make/buy this new missiles/avionics, ONLY because US maintenance teams, when they left, ruined everything they could reach).
1 Like
If those, with which you talking don’t hear (or don’t want hear) your arguments, spamming their narrative - it’s not easy to be diverse.
Just as me.
1 Like
since we have turkey patton in US TT, by your very own logic, iranian tomcat can easily go to US TT 🤡
Usa still would have the biggest claim over all those you named because they are the original owners and developers doesnt matter the politics behind it
Here you shit yourself.
Because US have ONLY AMBT (which they have by some unknown reason - Italy need it more), while Italy have Turkish Mangusta, AND Starfighter (which not in US tree, bozo).
1 Like
Why mad bro
So?
Who give a “quack”?
We have bunch if vechiles, in foreign (or even opposite) countries, “just because”.
As i said - US lost any rights and claims at this planes at moment, when they sold them.
IRIAF not friendly (even opposite) to US, so US can go… further, even without fact, that they have enough F-14, and we can calmly take it to someone else.
1 Like
Germany has turkish leopard and us has the turkish F-5 as well
Us still has the biggest right to the F-14, the chsnges are minimal only additional armament
You insult me by clown emoji.
I fear clowns.
Especially in conversations.
1 Like
Skins, you mean.
They ain’t, and i will not explain third time why.
1 Like