Get the F-16XL in the Space Program Event!

They’re textured as normal ventilation grilles and are present on the standard F-16 fuselage, so I’m pretty sure Gaijin haven’t treated them as dispensers.
I did think those blisters on the wing seemed likely for CM dispensers but not seen evidence for it.

Looking through Tony Landis’ book published by the AFMC History Office, the ingame one does seem to be missing provision for centreline weapons and support pods that may have included countermeasures or ECM, and the planned FLIR pod in the usual F-16 position
https://www.scribd.com/document/684919287/F-16XL-Book-Final-Web-1

Thanks for the clarification on those grilles. Never noticed them before because most f16’s are dark color so they don’t stand out.

I’d say an official NASA book about their own prototype is good enough evidence for the wing pod CM placement. But not up to me at the end of the day :)

Spacenoids Unite You have nothing to lose but the chains of Earths Gravity which pull you down! Those whom cling to and pollute the Earth there souls are held down by gravity which is why they cannot fly like us!
Long live Neo Zeon! – @gundamflexing on Tumblr

1 Like

And a better intake, so It can super cruise

god I want it.

Yep. Although would be nice for them to add XL-2 but with some more of it’s planned equipment like the better cockpit.

I already asked about making a report.

IMO it might even be able to take 8 AMRAAMS.
The 3rd to last row says specifically “(1) AMRAAM + (1) AMRAAM Launcher (MRL)”
There’s no reason to specify “AMRAAM Launcher (MRL)” if it’s just a single AMRAAM so I think that means a LAU-115 + 2x LAU-129 Rails.

1 Like

Kinda weird it doesnt’ get AGM-65Ds, considering it’ll most likely be at 12.3 where you have aircraft like the Su-30 with 6x Kh-29T

image
i mean… right above it

1 Like

I am being cautious, but having eight AIM-120s might push it to 13.7.

Six AIM-120s plus two AIM-9Ls seems like an optimal loadout for 13.3, IMO.

However, feel free to submit a bug report once it becomes available, and let’s see their response to an eight AIM-120s loadout.

So, selective realism?

4 Likes

russia gets broken fictional weapons while nato cant cuz realism

3 Likes

45K mission points? Damn, i gonna try, i don’t play so much anymore

Standard for top-tier event vehicles

1 Like

Yeah i know, still to much

BR for it should be 12.7 or 13.0 depending on it performance of course but that sounds reasonable right

Definitely not.

There was a convo about this in the F-16 thread a while ago.

image

Both of these are from the same book, however, the Test Store Loading was simply for testing (in a wind tunnel afaik)

Plus the Chief Engineer of the XL stated only x4 AMRAAM.


image
Book used for weapons stores
Interview with Chief Engineer:

2 Likes

I found the source for this as well (it was mentioned in a different book)
image

Here’s all the Important pages:

image
image
image
image

1 Like

To be fair, he did not specify or explicitly state the aircraft is LIMITED to four AMRAAMs. The excerpt you used was illustrating a comparison between F-16XL-1 and F-16A.

The F-16A ADF having AIM-120s on wingtips sets a precedent for six AIM-120s on the F-16XL-1, in my opinion.

If Gaijin really wants to put the F-16XL-1 at 13.3 (worst scenario), then there’s no reason for it to remain at 13.3 without a six AIM-120A loadout.

However, if Gaijin puts it at 13.0 first, then I would have no objection to restricting it to four AIM-120s.

1 Like

OMG i forgot we can do that 😈 im gonna do that too

1 Like