Maths isn’t your strongpoint and painting pretty pictures is not sources. There’s a good reason there are no combat reports where enemy fleets were spotted at the ridiculous ranges your abacus comes up with.
Try Norie’s nautical tables.
1 Like
Sigh look it up yourself: Earth Curve Calculator
Or geogebra one done by myself: GeoGebra Classic - GeoGebra
If you dont believe the data about the heigh of the Fuso tower here is proof:
Fuso pagoda height
As for the ilustration here is proof that ships are indeed sunken by 11.3 metres.
Spoiler
1 Like
All German BBs/BCs apart from Scharnhorst and, to a lesser extent, Bayern regularily face opponents that can lolpen their ammo-protecting armour, but most BBs and BCs in game are susceptible to getting ammo racked. There are only a few where it isn’t the main method of dispatching them, and none are completely immune to this.
2 Likes
So… This thing you didn’t know about till I mentioned it, and I’ve provided a source which has been a trusted one for aeons, which disagrees with your maths, which I know you can’t do from previous conversations but oddly does to countless action reports, ships logs and common sense…
Somehow seems like WT in a nutshell.
1 Like
How does your source conflict with what I said? From what I have seen it is perfectly in line with what I was saying.
How is my math wrong? Go on show me error.
Also what is the thing I didn’t know about?
1 Like
Norie is simply wrong, the formula is giving wrong numbers - source NASA Distance to the Horizon
1 Like