bro needs to go back to watching skibidi frfr
Im quite respectful, cant say the same thing for you tho.
So stating some inaccuracies means literally complaining huh? I suggest learn the difference between stating the facts and complaining.
Nah you guys decided to attack me cause i mentioned some inaccuracies about Abrams, congrats.
Oops my dementia is kicking in! Oops my dementia is kicking in! Oops my dementia is kicking in! Oops my dementia is kicking in! Oops my dementia is kicking in! Oops my dementia is kicking in! Oops my dementia is kicking in! Oops my dementia is kicking in! Oops my dementia is kicking in!
Spoiler
Oops my dementia is kicking in! Oops my dementia is kicking in! Oops my dementia is kicking in! Oops my dementia is kicking in! Oops my dementia is kicking in! Oops my dementia is kicking in! Oops my dementia is kicking in! Oops my dementia is kicking in! Oops my dementia is kicking in!
Hey guys, I think my dementia just kicked in!
Im just reading this but I haven’t read any further so pardon if it was already said, but one of the Arietes on Dev Server have spall Liner on their turret cheeks.
Yeah, it pisses me tf off. Some of my favorite planes almost ruined, and will be unless they revert.
Is that so? I’ll turn on the dev server to double check all of the Chinese vehicles, too.
I’ll check the Ariete as well. Maybe there’s something. They did stealthily add AHEAD to the PGZ09, after all.
Because you claimed they didnt have major inaccuracies so i just pointed them, surprised?
And i 100 percent agree on that. As i stated multiple times Chinese vehicles should get their Well deserved Spall liners.
Im quite respectful, maybe you should stop acting like a victim.
Cool victim blaming, maybe you shouldn’t be using vulgarities or are you going to claim you never did that either? Classic Panther2995.
So stating some inaccuracies means literally complaining huh? I suggest go back to highschool and learn what does stating means and complaining.
What you really mean to say is “So you mean complaining about the abrams and alleged problems in an unrelated thread means complaining huh?”
Yes. I believe you are the one in need of re-education.
Nah you guys decided to attack me cause i mentioned some inaccuracies about Abrams, congrats tho you guys showed your true çölleş tonight.
You showed up in a thread with nothing to do with the abrams and started crying about it, and then you’re surprised when people tell you to dry your eyes and get on-topic or be quiet? You really are the pinnacle of tone-deaf US main.
not like AHEAD even works right now I don’t know why they dont just make it Shrapnel-VT instead of Shrapnel-TF
Being passive aggressive is my favorite form of communication. Not sarcasm though, definitely not.
turret spall liners like that are probably the most useless thing in game only thing worse is the bradley spall liners and the chally UFP one
Sure , whatever you say.
Yeah that’s what I thought.
I accept your concession.
I think it’s about the uhhh…
Idk, maybe the Abram’s?
You can believe what you want to believe but i couldnt care less.
Well, no. You didn’t. None of what you pointed out is a major inaccuracy.
There is no real issue with the bustle.
One Abrams variant not being able to equip TUSK, WHILE ANOTHER ONE CAN, is barely an issue at all.
You literally added something that’s been proven wrong IN THIS THREAD to your list, as well (the non-existent spall liner isn’t an issue on the Abrams).
And lastly - the turret ring being volumetric isn’t actually guaranteed to make it stronger, nor would it be a significant buff. And the Abrams turret ring is already a volumetric hole from the side.
(I don’t think you understand that “volumetric” non pens actually come from volumetric SHELLS and not volumetric armor - armor that’s modeled as “volumetric” is usually weaker…)
Ch’ŏnma-ho–92 thread
I’ve already accepted your concession.
I don’t require a second.
That’s very interesting. Thank you for pointing this out.
At least it means that they’re actually looking at the tanks of minor nations…