it has less pen with APHE bro
Almost like its intentional. Still not as bad as the gunner/commander periscope being counted as a fire control system
Has less pen! Exactly! But due to speed, and nuclear bomb shells it’s so easy to play. It feels like a tank with a super speedy reload. I got several nukes with its APHE and it being stock.
Once I spaded it and got APDS I was dropping a nuke every few matches. Insane to think, since I think the only other nation I could do that with was France!
It’s almost like speed + fire rate = dominance
XM800 has the faster fire rate and near identical speed while being more agile. you played yourself
Niceee reporting me responses I see.
The schimitar seems a lot more survivable than it should be, like its predecessor the fox.
Both have the same gun that acts like a main 105mm cannon, but in the small caliber of a 30mm, it might not have fire rate, but due to all the other factors, these two are still king.
But that’s okay. I’ll just go abuse the fox and schimitar like they owe me money, since gaijin refuses to fix it, I will just play them until they get nerfed, or brought up in br. I’ll get all that free silver and rp easily
Scimitar*
not me, I want everyone to see the Soviet main cope
more of any fast-firing AFV in the soviet, german or American tree but worse in every aspect but played by better players
“Better players” that continue to report XD
Yeah no. Most Brit’s are pretty bad. The best players are spread out over all nations, with most being located in Sweden, due to how OP Sweden is.
It’s the vehicles over preforming / and or being very under br’d
The only thing I was a stock nuke in, other than the Brit bias, was the Ush. Hmm. Odd, both fast, small, lots of fire power. Is there a trend?
Only at certain BRs in GRB.
its not me dude, the more you cope the worse it makes your argument look.
Brit bias lmafo???
one of the most stupid things ive read on this forum
Conq mk2 at 7.7 with the armor of a T-55-AM-1 at a full br lower, sure no dart… but to say Brit bias doesn’t exist is a lie.
The Brit’s have plenty of fast “scout / IFV” vehicles that are egregiously op. Now you have a new addition to that.
You’ve already been confirmed to defend all of nato stats, and not actually look for balance.
Like a lot of the other nationalists on the forum.
It’s strange that some people look for balance, others need to validate their nations.
That’s saying something… But then again 90% of the rest is coming from the same person lol never known someone have so much hate towards a single set of vehicles that quite frankly should have been in the tech tree years ago. Second to that die in a single shot… Smells over powered to me… So many more vehicles you could hate more so that are straight busted at times, Su25s, tiger helicopters, lynx, obj 279, BVM, 2s38, RCV with apfsds, t55-am-1, Somua, PT-16 leo, Falcon, begleitpanzer, AGS, bmp2m… The list goes on… Naa unstabilised fox and scimitar with a 3 round clip 80rpm firerate and can die to MG fire… OP lool. They’re only a problem if you don’t pay attention, you can’t brawl with these vehicles head on.
There isn’t any bias, just poor gaijin balancing. +you are ignoring the disadvantages the Conq has.
Only the fox, but you can’t criticize that without being crucified by brit mains. Sure, it made anything without armour between 7.0-8.3 a massive pain to play, but since it’s British you can’t complain.
Yeah my fault I can’t hear engines 500m away, and it’s clearly my fault the tanks I play don’t have a roof MG to deal with light targets.
I don’t think the fox/scimitar/similar stuff is OP, they’re just annoying and I don’t think they should’nt have been added. They ruin the experience for non autocannon light tanks.
I’ve been confirmed to defend nato stats… Confirmed by who and by what statistics? You? If that’s the case then it has ZERO credibility.
They ruin the experience because you get out played by a vehicle with 110mm of pen… Bro that’s a skill issue, not a fox issue, a main gun round will send them to the hanger just using H.E.