MBT------ I did not include the event tanks, but I think the Object 640 known as the Black eagle and Object 195 known as the original T-14 Armata, I also did not include any br higher than 12.0 because it might shuffle a bit, mainly focus was going for the light tank and the anti tank Column, also I do think Russian tech need more MBT and the T-90M wasn’t that great thanks to its 4km reverse speed, adding the 2024 that was said to have 24km reverse would be great, so is the T80BVM 2024, which have modification to its engine too that able it to go faster than its perverse 12km.
SPAA---- I think the Pantsir s2 and Tor m2 don’t have to be in the game, but I do think the Tor M1 does deserve to be in Russian tech as it is a Russian vehicle and if the Chinese have it I think we should, also for people who play 11.3 and 11.7, the OSA or 2s6 is just not enough, Tor M1 would fix that problem of 2s6 not being able to track faster target.
6 Likes
Nope.
Very cool concept. Im amazed theres no armata in game yet despite there being a (admittedly very shitty modeled) challenger 3 prototype
I’m sure we will see things along the lines of this in the next couple years as gaijin runs out of anything to C&P into 5 different trees so are focred to do unique stuff again
1 Like
Object 195 is more than enough to counter any serious future threat than the T-14 Armata, and I have no doubt it has better armor layout.
USSR is in need of light tanks, if I had the power of choose, would leave MBTs addition to the long term and implement more light tanks such like Kurganets-25, BTR-90M and maybe the BTR-90M (Berezhok) would be great addition and certainly fill the gaps from 10.3 to 12.0.
2S25 is not a light tank, is a tank destroyer and I believe Gaijin classified it as a light tank for balancing reasons.
Regarding the T-14 Armata will be a free points target, barely armored and everything else. It’s a 2S38 with larger silhouette and cannon. And the active protection system would be a problem since it can intercept faster cannon-fired rounds, maybe in the far future, if the T-14 Armata and the T-14 Armata 152.4 mm is proved a reliable vehicle for the game, would be a great addition.
1 Like
Would love to see the T-15
1 Like
cr3td is genuinely worse than the cr2s, but the armata might actually be good if they use sources that ivan conscriptski drew on a napkin after seeing a mockup
1 Like
I’d replace the Pantsir-S2 with the Pantsir-SM, the S2 is effectively just a S1 with a Janus style radar set.
Armata would be insanely annoying to fight, like an AGS but fatter. I don’t think it would be balanced tbh.
yes
to be honest they can add a lot more, for mid tier they can add the 2s35, and maybe 8.0 or something they can add the btr82a or bmp1am at around 7.0 to 8.0.
and a little higher maybe the btr90 or the tigr with korent on it
also they can add in bunch of bmd vehicle such as BMD1 and 2
1 Like
???
No T-80BVM/T-90M exist with cope 24km/h reverse speed.
Thats solely wikipedia/news level ppl saying.
Same as T-90M’s -15kmh…
Has an actual source for this finally been revealed?
Or is this still based on that one video that really shouldn’t count for anything.
A top tier AGS sounds like fun
In CQC the T-14 would be as weak as everything else.
It’s only advantaged in long and medium range engagements for War Thunder.
Hence why I called it a fatter AGS. Both would be extraordinarily annoying to fight at range, as they are pretty much unkillable. (Atleast you can HE the AGS, but he can just keep moving)
After this, everyone who does not play for the USSR can safely delete the game. :D
Why would I? USA is better.
Object 477A and Object 195 also would be great vehicles.