Because it is a game, not a full simulator. We can debate endlessly what War Thunder should be, it will not change what the game is at its core, an accessible simulcade.
2 Likes
Its not like the Enlisted show how “fun” idea screen shake and tinnitus are… (if someone played that particular even when they were just constant) … - they removed it i think after 2 or 3 days because made ppl actually sic… and they want to bring that here WTF?? who in their right mind up there in dev department think its a good idea??
2 Likes
you special cases always say this then act nice when youre proved wrong
i know this comment is old, but they released a statement saying the 2s38 is one of the first to get said modules
1 Like
Cause Sweden doesn’t have a SPAA at 7.7.
They’re working on decompression.
Threatening a toddler tantrum won’t change anything.
there is something called the ZSU-57-2 at 7.0 and i got no problem bring it to 7.7 or 8.0. if you want to fix that problem just replace the ItsPv 90 to the one that use T-55 chassis and put it at 8.3 it will do the job and also a lot of nation don’t have 7.7 SPAA like Germany, Britain, China, etc. because their 7.0 SPAA would do just fine
Well, now that VEAK 40 is gone I’d like to see this thing take it’s place
2 Likes
There’s no 8.3 lineup.
Besides, the one we have is a production vehicle.
@Apollo_1641
The Ilmatorjuntapanssarivaunu 90, it’s already in-game.
you don’t need a good line-up for spaa as long as it do the job
Then you have no issues with the current one.
Fantastic, there’s no reason to remove real vehicles from War Thunder.
then you have no issue to not have an spaa at 7.7 then
tbh, that vehicle would be nice to add at 7.7 or 8.0 BR because its open top, very easy to kill, and no radar instead of Veak being moved down to 7.7 and lost its HE-VT
Yeah, in an ideal situation that’d be exactly the right solution.
The 40mm truck has one cool gimmick though, APFSDS.
Though the platform doesn’t really allow you to make use of it
1 Like
and also since it got no radar they could add a very limited HE-VT to it since it could fire it, but that would be asking too much
Did anyone grab a screenshot of the final vote results before the poll closed?
If you guys could leave the off-topic SPAA/HE-VT stuff for its own thread, that’d be great.
2 Likes
The punishment is already there, you’re immobilized for however long the repair lasts and are very likely to take more hits.
1 Like
The extra modules in select vehicles was close to 87% for, 13% against.
The stun mechanic was 41% for, 59% against.
The additional fires in fighting compartment was 49% for, 51% against.
The automatic crew healing was another 85-87% for, 15-13% against.
So only one of the ground battle damage modeling will be implement, two won’t. And the automatic healing will be added as well.
2 Likes
Thanks.
The only vehicles they mentioned initially were NATO MBTs, and only after they heard everyone make a stink they mentioned the 2S38 - except of course they aren’t raising its BR until they are fully finished with its modules (which could be never).
2 Likes
Alright, who’s the CAS main that telling the Dev’s to nerf Spaa AMX-10P? It’s the only well-rounded French Spaa in 5.7-7.0! (Truck doesn’t count/either the 50cal one).
Now it won’t be able to help ground forces with its nerfed depression.
1 Like