Ohhh well I think it would be fictional.
Possibly. There’s a lot of other skins in the datamine that are outright historical, or semi-historical at worst (due to the hyper-specific model of aircraft Australia used not being in-game)
I might when I get time try that. I don’t really have a youtube channel lol very small amount of views my videos get.
What do you mean by mission creep?
I’m not too concerned about a small channel, just want a short brief video so it can be archived and shared around more easily
mission creep as in I notice gradually more things being added to the repertoire of “issues with the harrier” in general like MFD and HUD and maybe even more down the line, so just be careful not to over-reach and muddle content, so issues can still be addressed feasibly without a complete revamp, or being turned down completely because of those secondary (albeit still important) aspects
3 Likes
I see so just another video that covers the current FM issues. Just lists them out instead of the 10 minute TTS ramble video.
more or less yes, if possible that is
Could do like a youtube short. TTS will be what it ends up being most likely though unfortunately.
They didnt… thats pulled out of someones ass
2 Likes
Yes talked to some people bout that today.
Also had some DMs from the Tech mod who talked with the Devs about the report.
Was there any good news or is it being ignored more?
They apparently still seem interested. They just still wont accept that the Harrier can go faster than .91 Mach and that is can sustain 5G turn at .95 Mach (that’s legit only 4 degrees AOA)
3 Likes
Something really dumb that kinda bugs me with the Legacy and early Sea Harriers: Gaijin didn’t give any of them the ability to remove their twin ADEN pods, when they had that capability IRL. I know it’d probably be stupid, but it would at least be nice to have in-game…
2 Likes
Every harrier could do that IRL actually. Also I want the drop tanks for sim.
New documents have also led me to believe that the Harrier 2 and 1 underperform. The Harrier Gr.5 was said to sustain 13 degrees a second with full internal fuel. The Harrier 1 V-N diagram was performed with gun pods and 2 missiles so it would only be logical if the E-M diagram was made with the same spec.
2 Likes
Yep, exactly
Honestly, aside from correcting performance and making the gunpods removable, my only two other complaints with the Legacy Harriers are incorrect cockpits for most, and a few lacking the ALE-37 CMs pod.
If all of that got fixed, then I’d be completely satisfied with the Harriers, and wouldn’t ask Gaijin to add anything else for them
One day maybe. My wish list is Sea Harrier with correct performance and HUD.
1 Like
Fix the damn harrier gayjinxxxxx
4 Likes
I did some testing in comparison with a NATO document I have (claiming a time to climb of 142 seconds to 40k feet)
I tested a clean Gr1 with minimum fuel capacity in a few different climb profiles. The fastest climb to 40k was 3 minutes.
That’s 30 seconds to slow.
1 Like
What VIFF should do. Compared with what it does in game. IRL as seen in the historic footage the harrier can go from cruising in level flight to flying 180 in the opposite direction in 2-3 seconds. In game to perform the same maneuver at similar (guessed similar) airspeed is a whole 10+ seconds.
3 Likes
Welp, I’m going to wish you luck, I suspect I may not be around much longer as they dont like my response…
What happened lol