You mean like this?
This is the closest match I could find, but it’s not grey so I know it’s the wrong one, I’ll try to keep looking
Also, congrats on getting the 69th comment, nice.
This is the closest match I could find, but it’s not grey so I know it’s the wrong one, I’ll try to keep looking
Yeah, ive seen it repeated a lot and a few tank crew journals even talk about only having enough paint for a single panel and needing to make do and apply it before moving. For the most part of the war the fins were essentially surviving on whatever scraps they had as the tanks were constantly needed in different positions. Not too surprising that crews did almost anything they could to blend in considering the Fins had T-26’s fighting vehicle they reasonable weren’t made to fight considering stuff like the T-26 and T-50 were Infantry support vehicles.
1 Like
Yeah thats the camo, again i dont know if it was painted because it looked good for a museum or what, theres only one surviving Niki in Finland so i guess id need to see if the Museum ever painted it again. The bottom camo isn’t correct but its a nice find. Could be a camo similar to the grey one you posted above but the colors to me seem like they should be darker but who knows. A lot of detailed camos weren’t recorded and are lost to time unfortunately.
Guess the next time I’m in Finland ill need to visit some museums and ask around. Unfortunately it will be a while since i already went to Finland 2 months ago. Would be nice to get some angles of the surviving Niki at the Parola Museum.
1 Like
You could try emailing the museum directly and asking them, I planned to do it myself since I was wondering for quite a while (like, around a year until today) which nation actually made the extra armour since I swear to God that half of them say Finland added it, the other half day the USSR added it and wikipedia for some reason says both are true, so getting info from the people who actually have the documents and records seems like the reasonable thing to do for finding out about the paint jobs, I hope at least.
The main documents specifically note Finland as the Finnish pushed the tank outside of its original role as an Infantry support vehicle. They gave it armor so it could be used against other tanks. The bolted armor is actually a fairly common thing with Finland given what they did with the remains of the BT’s in a lot of cases. Additionally no Soviet T-50 exist in images as far as im aware. Its also not a new thing for Finland to push vehicles outside of their intended roles as they needed everything they during the war.
1 Like
No soviet T-50 images exist? I think you might wanna rephrase that since the only other one (without the extra armour obviously) is in Russia right now.
Was referring specifically with Armor. The T-50 is a Soviet vehicle but ive never seen proof such as photos of a Soviet use T-50 with the armor as seen in the Niki. My bad on the wording.
1 Like
A bit off topic but didn’t Finland also add additional armor to some captured T-28s? Although I’m not sure if they were redesignated as T-28Es or if this simply referred to the one Soviet uparmored model they captured.
1 Like
Yes Finland captured a few T-28’s and added similar bolted armor like that of the Niki. The Soviet model with add on armor is a bit different but im trying to remember if photos of them side by side exist. It may just have been the T-28’s prior to be modified for Finnish use. Even the KV-1B underwent changes to allow for faster repairs and allowing for additional armor and storage. Though we actually have the image of the KV-1E prior to it being captured and restored by the Fins.
1 Like
They did capture at least 1 T-28E, but I haven’t seen anything about hem uparmouring earlier versions that were captured.
Well, I do believe the T-28 at Parola is one of the Finnish uparmored models, or at the very least recieved some additional plates on the turret
And pictures of the upgrade in general seem to be uncommon
I am interested in the KV-1B modifications though, I had been under the impression that the Finns didn’t make any changes to the armor scheme?
I don’t believe the armor added would be as extensive as the Niki as they had so mamy T-28’s and not enough parts to keep them all up at the same time. Many groups had to essentially shelve the vehicle until command could get them supplies and tell them where they were needed.
The few notes on the BT’s shine some light on this as the majority of captured Soviet equipment was so poorly kept that they feasible couldn’t keep 1 vehicle running with 50 spare vehicles as everything was either warped, cracked, missing, or jery rigged to barely function. This wasn’t just a BT issue but a common theme of soviet vehicles that were captured.
Minor improvements to the KV-1B like additional storage boxes, a turret neck V shaped armor piece like that found in the KV-1A which also lacked the neck armor. You actually find a few minor differences that Finland added to make the vehicles easier to fix or work on as they were the sole heavies of the army aside from the T-28’s
Even the T34-75 in Parola still features the remnants of its Finnish gun collar over the Soviet model since they replaced the 85mm with the Panzer IV 75mm.
I just recall it being mentioned on the Jaeger Platoon website, which most confusingly almost seems to refer to them as T-28Es
Simple thing, the KV-1B in game is an early model before the Fins modified it with their own things. Even the version in game is missing the forward light on the hull which lacks the Finnish armor cover for it. Its one of the most unique finnish modifications that you see only on their vehicles. I planned on making a suggestion for the Late KV-1B to be added to Finland but honestly the fact that gaijin probably wouldn’t add it has kinda killed my push to finish the siggestion.
In game missing the turret neck armor and the front road light. Additionally its missing the spare turret handles on the rear.
Comparing the image of the KV-1E before it was captured its easy to see some of the changes but im going off topic.
But the Fins weren’t strangers to modifying their vehicles so they were easier to work on and live in.
3 Likes
I see what you mean though, the turret ring is actually a pretty reliable killspot for the KV-1E/B, so I’d certainly want to see this upgrade ingame if possible, would help add some Finnish flair to it.
1 Like
Eh, id rather the current KV-1B be left as is. That way the actual Finnish KV-1B can go to Finland at 4.3, slightly better armor so .3 increase. Most of all it means Finland could have both of their KV’s.
Again unfortunately my motivation to make the post is all but gone, if anyone wants the info i have I’ll send everything i have. Maybe ill do it one day but i just don’t want to since i feel gaijin would deny it.
2 Likes
I mean I don’t think Gaijin would deny it, they only denied the other Finnish KV-1 suggestion I recall you doing because there wasn’t any evidence to support it actually entering Suomi service. And considering the support for other uparmored Finnish vehicles such as the T-26, StuG, and the T-50 in this suggestion, I’m sure people will be happy to support.
Eh, that one was fair but considering their stance and the times I’ve been told by Smin that the KV-1B will not ever go to Finland has discouraged me. I may eventually finish the suggestion but i just dont have the will.
4 Likes
It’s alright, I do feel like I’ve seen one image, but I might just be misremembering things.