+1,Put it under 16C
+1 for the British tree.
Britain hasn’t used the f16e
America hasn’t used the skink
+1 US sqv
Not saying I agree with skink but the Sherman chassis is an American design. F-16E is not British
Germany never used the Hunter
Italy never used the Tu-2
Russian Su-27’s never used their Radar and RWR at the same time
Britain never used the G6
Japan never used the Gripen
China never used the Mirage 2000
Am I missing anyone?
- Swiss Hunter went to Germany for some reason
- Hungary sub?
- Bug report it then
- South Africa sub
- Thai sub
- Both PRC and ROC are counted as China for WT
UK doesn’t have a sub for it and it doesn’t have an origin claim for it.
+1 for a future UAE sub (but preferably not in the US cause we have more than enough F-16s that can come :])
I did originally say that as a joke
However the UAE was a British protectorate from 1820 to 1971. That enough of a claim?
UK already has 2 subs. I don’t think they would get a UAE one. Right now, they really don’t have any claim to it since it’s from the 90’s as well…also don’t think they count protectorates as UK but you could prove me wrong
There is like 2 more F-16 that would be a step forward. One of which is the F-16V, so another export model. Seeing as it doesn’t make sense in any other tree it should go to US like the M1A1 AIM and F-14A IRIAF
France has 3
Well things could change in the future. with maybe a new tree that can fit it better. But if it was added rn it would probably go to the US (or the UK :])
1 of them has basically no military, it’s effectively 2. Pretty sure they added it just to sound nicer
Persian Tomcat No.2?
maybe, could be squadron
The US can do with all its unique export variant of its vehicles instead of a sub tree. It’s got so many export-only vehicles
Given that U.S. got the Persian tomcat and that is easily generalized as ‘middle east’ and it’s a U.S. vehicle. I wouldn’t be surprised if it would wind up in the U.S. tree. You’d get indian vehicles though, like the Mig-21 Bison.