would be soooo huge if true, if its the 13.0 belgian one it would genuinely be a massive QoL improvement!
F16AM not F16A
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/KnIyNirQXpAX
Although this was reported a year ago, sadly, we have not yet received a response :(
1 Like
I apologize for pinging you so often recently, but do you have any news about this reported issue? It’s been too long since I heard back.
That and the fact that the plane cannot mount mavericks or amraams on the countermeasure pylons, even though they are fully compatible with them ( there was also a report on that iirc)
1 Like
aw damn
how do you grab the devs attention?
This sounds a bit odd and i’m having trouble understanding what it is you are refering to.
Is the function for the aircraft already a mechanic in the game available on other aircraft?
Or is it a new mechanic that no aircraft in the game has yet and that you want to be added to the game?
(Could you link to the report you made and the answer you got?)
It’s not a new mechanic. At all.
What he meant was how and when will the devs get around to the issue and fix it. It’s not too much of a complicated one either.
The report was shared by the person he replied to btw.
It could be depending on what they are referring to, the ability to lock radar with HMD is in the game, the ability to see radar targets in HMD cockpit view is (but i think only one vehicle has it? A-10C).
The ability to through the HMD see radar targets when in third person view isn’t.
The reason i asked is because, as far as i know, the only reason a bug reporting manager referred them to the forum is to make a suggestion for a mechanic not yet in game.
What issue though? To me personally it isn’t fully clear given the other circumstances. I assume it’s the “normal” HMD radar functionality in game but if that is the case it shouldn’t have been sent to the forums.
No, that is a different report made by a different user that has no answer.
???
I want whatever you’re on tbh, no offense. Reading comprehension much though?
1 Like
sigh…
Please explain where i’m wrong, i have no problem being corrected if i actually said something wrong.
I have VERY good reading comprehension. given the surrounding circumstances of this main post there has to have been a miscommunication somewhere between OP and either the bug reporting manager or between the OP and the rest of us in this thread. I’m just trying to figure out where in the timeline of events things went in the wrong direction so that i can redirect the OP to the correct place and if applicable link a guide on how to create a correct bug report/suggestion/etc.
The OP asked “how to get the attention of the devs?” in reply to someone commenting and posting a bug report regarding the radar slaving of HMD on F-16AM, about which the OP was inquiring. The OP asked that because, ironically, the bug report has not been worked out yet and would like for it to be forwarded or have the devs reminded of its existence.
That extensive enough? I cannot possibly see anything confusing there and frankly see nothing nor you nor me can do about it.
1 Like
This isn’t explicitly stated.
No, they had themselves created a bug report:
And was told to go to the forums about it.
Which is the entire reason for me asking for clarification. Had OP made a report about the same issue as the linked report above they would have (or at least should have) gotten told “duplicate” and not been sent to the forums. Therefore i assumed that the OP’s bug report was on something different OR that the bug reporting manager had given the wrong information. Which one of the two would be good to clarify to be able to proceed further and give a response to the correct clarified situation.
If the OP’s report was indeed on a different issue, a clarification on what that issue is determines the appropriate response of wither instruct on suggestions or instruct on bug reporting.
If the OP had made a report on the same issue and was told wrong information then that would have been good to know and be able to message the Technical moderators about. As well as perhaps instruct the OP on how to better write a report with clearer information if needed (which is why i asked for a link to the report they created, not a general report on what is likely to be the same issue but not explicitly stated as such).
Read up in my replies the link and exact qoute is there. Im saying that the F16AM only has IR HMS and not Radar HMS but realistically it has both
I cannot see a link to your bug report?
Thats not an Bug report, thats just the (Source)
Bug report are there:
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/KnIyNirQXpAX
In this case the Missing Radar HMD is allready reported and has been Accepted, next step is that an Dev takes his time for it and checks the source and if it makes sense in his eyes he fixes it…
When will it be fixed?
Thats the sad part, no one knows… it can take from days to multiple years.
Some stuff is reported since nearly 8 Years, and just got fixed like an year ago (I am referring to the Brake chute of the Arado 234 B and C)
That is a source, not your report that you created.
I did a ticket through gaijin support, i didnt know how to do a bug report
1 Like