Mach 0.55. And I would like to see someone hit the time marks for acceleration.
It is as close as we can get in the game. Especially since everyone except for a couple Migs are missing true emergency power. So that is what we have.
You are fundamentally misunderstanding what engine trim is. It is not a throttle setting or anything like that.
Engine trim is a setting in the engine control unit which slightly adjusts the various limiters in the engine to optimise the engine for either better engine life or more thrust. 102% is the highest thrust trim option available and it is what the in game aircraft is modelled as using.
So no; the correct way to test that graph is with 110% throttle in game. That is how you actually recreate maximum thrust with 102% engine trim.
It doesn’t matter how many sources you find if you don’t actually understand the testing method.
102% engine trim =/= 100% War Thunder Thrust…
It IS a maximum thrust test…
You also seem to evade my question: Where did you see the Mach 0.54?!
Here… https://youtu.be/h7qwTmiUabY another test run, this time in reference mode, still with weaponry, still not perfect, but less harsh pulling up and as you can see the Aircraft keeps Mach 0.8 at 40K feet.
It also reaches the 39K feet from your earlier source in 1:06 seconds which is absolutely within margin of error for a plane that is nowhere near as light as the test plane…
Why are you so aggressively trying to misuse source material to make the F-15 ingame look bad? It’s nowhere near as bad and is within a 15% margin of error to a HEAVILY modified trial aircraft…
Your opening post implied the F-15 is missing “more than 50%” of it’s thrust, yet the ingame model pretty much matches the charts you posted…
It’s starting to feel a bit like that, but I am hopeful that it will click in a minute =)
He seems to be genuinely misinformed on the testing method so I see why he is so annoyed back at us, because both sides think they are right, as per usual.
I just hope the confusion get’s cleared and we get to see that either the F-15 is performing pretty close to real life or we find some areas that need some tweaking. But it’s nowhere near as drastic as OP implies…
Perfect, I see so many people come on the forums to post bug reports and their often ignored,
I hope the f15 gets more thurst, but rn its probably the best top tier aircraft
Anyone can change under the right circumstances. Maybe his day will come as well. Let’s not get to personal in this matter and instead try to bring the topic closer to him so in the future he can make better estmimates on how these things work.
If we just bash people and kick them down, they won’t have a chance of getting up and contributing like the rest. Let’s help them and give them a chance.
It’s my first conversation with OP so I am still hoping for the best and that we all end up learning something in the end =)
In my experience with internet trolls, he’ll just move on to another topic and stop responding if it looks like he can’t win the argument. Not really a you win or he wins sorta deal just an either he wins or he leaves.
I know what you mean, but he doesn’t seem to fit standard internet troll behaviour. He seems to do spend time testing, looking for sources etc.
It’s just that he seems to misinterpret what he finds and is convinced he is right. Nothing wrong with that. But at some point you need to realize you MIGHT be wrong and once you can accept that… I see light at the end of the tunnel :D