F-15E: The Strike Eagle

Official News, Development Blogs and Updates
22

When is the dev server going live? The dev stream happened, so when?

23

Hasn’t mattered for a while. Case in point; the Panstir and Kh38.

7 Likes
24

I don’t even know if y’all are really serious with this lol

9 Likes
25

AIM-120B is good enough for now. But maybe the 229 would have been great to have but it’ll be a great interdictor/fighter-attacker anyways

3 Likes
26

Pantsir is still easy to dodge if you’re not stupid, and the KH-38MT has the same lock range as any other FnF AGM, while still being attached to a flying brick.

1 Like
27

100% serious. The aircraft uses Aim-120Cs in service today. It’s a brick of an airframe since it’s a ground pounder focused variant.

2 Likes
28

Why do you believe that strike aircraft should be on an even footing with fighter aircraft?

5 Likes
29

When is the dev server going to go live?

30

The B already exists in game and it’s no better than the A model. Gaijin nerfed it, along with the AAM4 if I remember correctly. It will be fine with the 120C. Like I said, can’t gimp every new US vehicle.

2 Likes
31

  1. Kh38 is attached to Su-25, idk about pantsir but judging at how many threads about cas there are I don’t think it’s too op.

  2. Ground isn’t the only mode in wt, 120C5s would completely mess up air RB.

It’s brickier than the F-15C but not a brick. By this logic MiG-29SMT should get R-77-1 and R-74 because it’s also a brick that can’t dogfight and is in service with those.

6 Likes
32

It’s kinda odd we are getting SDBs but in the teaser and dev streams it is only shown using the Lantirn pod (gen 1 thermals). Are there considerations for giving it Litening II like most other jets at its BR? Litening predates the SDBs even. It’s not the worst if not but it makes not a lot of sense.

Ideally would’ve liked to see the Sniper as well so that the A-10C can benefit from the same pod (as well as SDBs).

3 Likes
33

THIS.
I would freaking love if all attackers with good missiles that are undertiered because of bad airframe got pumped up to the same br those missiles are found on fighters.
People playing their attackers in air RB to farm stuff for ground is not my issue. This goes for all countries (and especially to A10s and Su-25s)

5 Likes
34

If that’s what it uses, sure. Let’s also not gimp the Brimestone either and give every airframe that carried HARM-88s those as well.

3 Likes
35

sure, let’s completely fuck air RB balance by adding extremely modern missiles.

8 Likes
36

I believe that if the airframe had 120Cs, it should get its 120Cs.

1 Like
37

Then it can get a quick trip to the battle rating this missiles belong to which is 15.0+ currently.

4 Likes
38

Nerfing the capably of vehicles to keep it within a box it historically can exceed seems asinine. Especially when it seems to happen to one set of vehicles more than others. Spending more on your defense budget then the next ten nations has to amount for something.

1 Like
39

They gave 229 for 15I.

40

Yeah, I have no issue with adding OP missiles, as long as they get BR’d appropriately. I would be fine with F-22 coming this update if it was alone at it’s own BR, far above current top tier.

3 Likes
41

I mean if you think your country should be better in a video game because it spends a trillion on defense i don’t know what to say

8 Likes