Last I checked the SOP was they were to drop 2 in the ocean if launched with 6 and didn’t spend any, due to being below safe fuel levels to attempt carrier landings with 6 and on correct weight.
Do you know what drag is?
Last I checked the SOP was they were to drop 2 in the ocean if launched with 6 and didn’t spend any, due to being below safe fuel levels to attempt carrier landings with 6 and on correct weight.
Do you know what drag is?
Because while it could land with 6, it is a lot harder to do, and much cheaper to just dump the missiles.
I was going to ask you the same thing.
The speed of the airframe is more of an engine limitation than an airframe one provided the slats are retained on the front for stability above mach 2.
Are you taking that top speed from Wikipedia?
I just checked the source for it. It says Mach 2.5 as the structural maximum speed, not as its actual top attainable speed in level flight.
There’s no possible way the F-111B could surpass the F-14 both using TF-30s. Not surprising considering that the TF-30 was considered insufficient for the aircraft.
The recent Kish Island airshow event included Iranian F-14 Tomcats.
Beautiful to see the F-14 still in the air after all these years.
No way I have that one in game lol
They did a good job modelling it ngl
I still remember the VF-154 Black Knights F-14As flys in my hometown.
Good days.
Comparison between the F-14A and F-15C, I was surprised that the F-14 pilot says the max AoA of the Tomcat is 25 AoA - time past 38:00
From the 31st minute the comparison between the F-14 and the F-15 starts, very interesting.
XEF-142 is the designation on this Grumman scale model for the F-14 AEW / AWACS.
Though it might just be an in-house joke.
The three seat F-14 you posted is a photoshop and the SR-71 just has an E-3 Sentry AWACS behind it.
Former USAF pilots and one of the few people who flew both F-15C and F-14A (through an exchange program) talking about how AWG-9 and Phoenix combination was much harder to notch than F-15C’s radar and AMRAAM combination, and how the notching tactics that they had learned to use in the F-15C vs F-15C combat was not effective in F-14A vs F-14A fights, as AWG-9 was able to maintain the lock and guide in the Phoenix.
From 57:35
Interesting, I’ve also seen interviews where F-15 pilots (from Kadena AB) have talked about how the F-14 AWG-9 and Phoenix missiles are pretty easy to beat if you know how to do it.
Can these be used as sources at all?
A guy who flew and practiced air to air combat with both F-15C and F-14A is pretty much as an objective of a source as you can get, barring a scientific study doing a practical comparison of both radars’ performance.
They don’t trust the F-5’s natops why would they trust a pilots account?
Subjectively, yes, but Kadena’s not lying. Techniques get upgraded, F-15Cs change, tactics and experience vary.
But it’s a good thing the AWG-9 wasn’t always just for “beauty”, as I often read from Eagle pilots when they talk about the F-14 Turkey.
IRL and in the game AWG-9 and AIM-54 have obvious advantages over F-15C and AIM-120A:
Wait. Wait. Developer communicate with users on forum? Is it unique feature of .com forum?
[Suggestion] F-14A Early could carry AIM-9L sidewinder
Not sure this bug report can pass but, needed to post it.
Wouldn’t the IRSTS / TCS / IRST-21 make it almost functionally immune to Notching due to optical / IR lock-on? Why would it need to rely on the radar at all.
This topic has already been covered, doesn’t quite work like that in look-down.