Harrier has none.
1 Like
The channel loss on the Pegasus engine was some 200 lbs of thrust less when installed and pointing the nozzles at 90 degrees.
really good intake design next to no intake basically and the auxiallry air intakes help a lot
As do they boundary layer doors.
1 Like
yeah it shows you can midigate the effects of channel loss by designing properly in a plane with TVC
1 Like
Cats can squeeze into the tiniest gaps— That’s true for both the F-14 fighter jet and the animal kind
1 Like
bring back upgraded legacy hornet as an A-4/A-7 type and replace F/A-18E with F/A-XX, then use upgraded F-35C’s like F-4J’s
3 Likes
You can’t have multiple planes in the same message you need to make separate messages for each one. Otherwise it won’t count.
1 Like
this for F-14A early.
and this for F-14B
Thank you now im make it sperarated.
f-15 same br as the f-14a r we deadass vro
I make that suggess now.
1 Like
Tbh I don’t think we need compression as more of we need decompression also giving the F-14A aim7m with aim9L and F-14B aim7mh or aim7P with aim9m
3 Likes
Hope we will get F-14D in DCS and war thunder.
In warthunder is way easier to implement F-14D , because the planes from the get go are realistic but not 100% , same with weapon system. So minor - convinient errors are acceptable if there is logic behind it.
You have 14B flight model , make it +1 volume more stable because of the modern/digital flight controls while also give it a cobra button (it had button that could give you maximum maneuvering capability -not exactly a FBW override , but still…) . Give it IRST and APG-71 (in game you take APG-70, give it more range and have a better look-down capabity/clutter resistance) . It doesn’t have to be 1:1 adaptation for the moment and you can use approximate values by comparison with other systems (better/worse) and have the general effect it would provide.
For example it had better ECCM than APG-70…ok , if APG-70 have ECCM a 5, give it a 7 , 9/10 being AESAs and their suits…
It’s not 1:1 accurate, but we’ve seen worse adaptations in game already.
Imagine most of the 4,5 gens are currently highly classified anyway. Their values are already approximate or generic data.
If they do it on DC’s , however , people will get mad because it’s a SIM… in a realistic game though, they already pull those things . They even buff/nerf for balance, which wasn’t possible IRL or for SIM. In a SIM if it was bad , it was bad…let it be bad.
Also , you can see they relesed Tomcats and left them unfinished ,which makes me believe it was totally controlled because they understood it was too good for its time of implementation in the game. They will probably refurbish/fix them when some things are settled, but they see high demand (Sales) in more modern stuff.
6 Likes
Well well well
Actual test AMRAAM on the belly pylons. Fits snugly.
Funny thing I wasn’t even trying to find this. I was looking for information on AMRAAM’s seeker and found this.
8 Likes
Has a good RWR and Radar
While flight performance is poor.
The weapons are good for the BR.
Good cms.
The IR F-14s Radar and RWR are horrendous.
Fakours are good against AFK players
Aim9P is an insult for a 13.0 aircraft
And like Harriers F-14s are as hot as the sun.
6 Likes
Its mean techniquely Its can carry 6.