somewhat like 20 deg
That’s still pretty good
page not found
Players have been using the Tomcat in full-real for years. There are definitely situations where it benefits. I fully agree with Mikey’s argument that having your camera skewed and mouse pointer removed is way more harmful than not having a simple button. The argument that it’s detrimental just doesn’t make any sense.
If it’s just full real with mouse aim, why not give that to more planes to begin with? As a control scheme or anything. This is simply unfair for the planes that don’t get it.
2 Likes
1 Like
Going to be doing a lot of deep research over the summer for the F-14. My first goal will probably be the radar.
good luck
(you will probably find nothing)
1 Like
Thanks??
you are not the first person that tries to find something on the awg-9, is what iam saying
1 Like
Too bad they are still not modeled PAL modes :/
Was playing the F-14A a while back and noticed this weird thing and decided to forget about it, after couple months I’ve decided to revisit the F-14A and this modelling error is still occurrent. Can someone please tell me whether this is a in-game modelling error or its just the fact I’m going insane?
IRIAF F-14A Pylons
The AIM-9P and Sedjeel are touching one another lmao
2 Likes
Is it possible to get TCS(AN/AXX-1) for F-14A Early?
I just checked some footages from AIMVAL/ACEVAL in late 1970s but, I see some F-14A has TCS.
They modeled the F-14A Early from the 1977 SAC, which coincided with the AIMVAL/ACEVAL being done.
2 Likes
Hopefully they add it.
1 Like
“Nope, because we don’t wanna/feel like it”
1 Like
Exactly. They’re literally making stuff up as they go along just to not give anything to the F-14.
1 Like
It was definitely done, the issue is that this technically occurred later than the arbitrary cutoff ('77 SAC) that Gaijin are using for the “Early” F-14A, in order to give it access to the AIM-9D & -9H (see '74 SAC). We know that the TCS specs at very least predate 1982 (the -A attached to the code indicates that it is the second revision of the document, though I can’t find a date for the initial publication) The ALR-23 IRSTS was optionally able to be mounted so it should have it.
As an aside I do think the ALR-23 should be able to be reported for the -14A, as it is present in the following video, which is from ~1974.
1 Like
But that would require effort from Gaijin :(
I’m aware that it was deployed in the fleet and began to be specified in the NAVAIR flight manual in the 1980s but, If we can find some docs proving that TCS was tested/installed by April 1977, maybe They can add TCS to the F-14A Early. At least in terms of tested weaponry and functionality, they are somewhat lenient, just like VTAS for Navy Phantoms and the SRAAMs for Hunter F.6.
It is shame that they didn’t add ALR-23 for F-14A Early even if they are completely useless.
Also F-14A late when Gaijin )))))
1 Like
It’s not useless, it would make the radar (when within IRSTS’s gimbal limits [?+/- 65 degrees?, seems a little high]) immune to chaff and Notching meaning that you would trade some limitations on tracking geometry for much more reliable Radar missiles (Within 10 Nmi [~18km]), and the ability to passively track off bore targets for Sidewinder usage without relying on the radar.
1 Like