@hinjanattori
16 degrees per second sustained turn rate with 5700kg of fuel for F-111F.
10,000kgf engines static, 14,800kgf at speed.
F-14A’s sustained turn rate is 16.7 degrees per second with 5000kg of fuel.
Both clean. You add AIM-7s to the F-14A and it’ll be closer to the F-111F than further apart.
Vark:
Yeah lol
That’s fair
Lmao
Can’t wait for the RAAF Hornet with ASRAAM :)
Nah, kiwi Skyhawks
Probably not discrimination
Just lack of communication internally
I would also like to reiterate my extreme disappointment at Gaijin skipping a whole generation of aircraft, the F-111E, F-111C pre-AUP, and Su-24 in favour of the F-111F, F-111C AUP, and Su-24M. Please stop skipping aircraft just because later ones are more hype!
Have you considered that, it’s on the Dev server and so does not necessarily reflect its actual performance once it reaches live.
Have you even flown the F-111A after the FM changes? The others aren’t going to be that much better.
Even even better: Kiwi F-16’s
F111E wasn’t very special, not much very different form the 111A, the 111F was an acceptable jump bc it gave increased capabilities without too much difference.
used the wrong words. They have been corrected.
AIM-9L is a pretty big difference, and of course the F should have 9Ms. Plus higher countermeasures count like the F. It’s similar to the WTD61 or new Italian Tornado.
I’d much rather them just fix the countermeasure bug, than add 9m which would significantly raise its BR
Good, it should have its accurate weapons and an appropriate BR. Same with AGM-130s which would bump up the BR in GRB.
You want an F-111 around 11.3? That’s the F-111E!
What about the 111D? Ik it had lot of issues but it’s far more interesting than the E
Nah because I’d like the 111D to have the YAIM-7G, which would probably make it a premium, squadron, or event vehicle.
The 111F will be fine once they fix CM, if they add the E or D then they should give it full armament
So, when are we gonna get an Australian Abrams for Britain to go along with that Aardvark?
Or are you just gonna go back to denying Aussie (and Canadian) vehicles for the British trees?
