you probably think the 106’s missiles are better just because they have super in the name
How did you reach this conclusion. This is not what I was saying.
don’t try to teach me about American missiles when your only American vehicle is the IRIAF
Consequences of propaganda and misinformation against AIM-4 Falcons, I guess.
depending on AIM-4D performance i want G/F kept as they will fit and connect
I’m gonna call as I see it: Gaijin is way in over their head with this update and they decided they have a lot more things to work on before even trying to fix the F102 and launch it in an acceptable state, and I’ll be understanding on that front.
But @Gunjob , @Smin1080p_WT , for crying out loud, adding a vehicle to the tech tree to 9.0 BR with ONLY 2 air to air missiles when stock is outright sadistic.

If nothing else, at least tell the developers to either give it 6 aim-4G missiles or the 24 FFAR rockets to start with, even if they don’t manage to add the gunpods as a modification.
i bet they noticed the dev server is ending soon so they decided to just keep the placeholder Missiles and act like they are suddenly compatible
I feared this would happen.
Hello Coffee can, allow me to post some clips of the AIM-4D fm from the dev server (it was added and we think it’s mostly correct aside from high drag)
I hope that seeing the immediate advantage in acceleration, you reconsider your opinion of these missiles
he’s absolutely got no idea how the advantage feels since he doesn’t even own the 106
those are the rails used on F-4s to launch AIM-4Ds i have an email from murph who submitted the pic
A new bug report is up.
[DEV] F-102A Missing AIM-4A/B/C/D Falcon Missiles
The most likely scenarios for this bug report are either: “Forwarded/Submitted as a suggestion” or “Not a bug. These AIM-4 Falcons are inferior, and the F-102A is to use the AIM-4G/-4F going forward.”
they actually did this to my MiG-25PD R-60A and R-40T report
Technical compatibility is when I can shove dimensionally impossible Super Falcons into the F-102A’s smaller weapons bay.

I have every single aircraft in the tt lil bro, not sure what you mean, including f106
you cannot judge anything by a dev server model dude, that missile is far from complete
this is literally incorrect lmao, I have more rare vehicles than you do lmao
it has the correct weight, thrust, and maneuverability
what’s unchanged is the drag, which is still the higher AIM-4G
I agree, it’s not perfect, but it paints an optimistic picture
correction V2
the weight is 1Kg off, the maneuverability may be overperforming, but it should also be faster than it is even now, which is the real promising aspect of these variants

