yeah tho the trailer one looks funky. Bit too thick.
NVM i didnt mean the TMC i meant the ITSU
This is why i am asking
They honestly do, but they could change it soon hopefully
Small bombs, Brimstone?
Brimstone is different
watch them bee BOL versions of the pylon and the Typhoon comes with the ability to run 6x BOL pylons xD
Edit: Actually, my funny guess might be right…
almost
its the ITSPL, not TMC.
they gave the J-10 the double rail while also carrying the single rails, they could give this here but again, i think its a balancing decision. 2+6 is the same as the j-10 and mirage, better than gripen, ig somewhat similar to f-15e, better than f-16…
the naming goes like this (left hand or LH and right hand or RH)
ITSPL integrated tip stub launcher - outboard wing pylon OWP - centre wing pylon CWP - inboard wing pylon IWP - FWD and REAR MRAAM Eject Launchers (MEL)
plus the centre under fuselage pylon
thats the naming from wing tip to fuselage
2 Likes
yea i am tired and corrected myself XD
@Gunjob I know Gaijin doesn’t like Janes, but if anyone has this book maybe there is more Striker 1 images there? Tagging you because I think you probably know all the Brit fans who may have a copy.
itsu is the station unit. the whole thing is the ITSPL
if they dont ungimp bol then we’ll need 6x of them lmao
1 Like
Nah, they have 2 built in bols if iam not mistaken, which is frankly, not enough given how poorly bol performs ingame.
Is there an any photo of MRAAM on inboard pylon?
no
yea sorry again i am tired
I know they have 2, but those double IRAAM rails really REALLY look like BOL as well…
Like, this is a better pic to see the ingame modelled double rails look MUCH thicker than the irl ones:
Wing mraams are launched from rail or ejector launcher?
Honesty I couldn’t say. The name “Striker” seems to have been applied to a few different HMDs (or at least different versions of a common HMD with significantly different functionality) over the years. Just to make things confusing.
No clue