By making a bug report
generaly the fact stays US needed a relatively cheaper missle to equip all their aircrafts.
Else the price becomes to high. Since European nations overall had less aircraft they were able to focus more on quality. Hence Meteor and stronger Fox2s
1 Like
Can confirm, making WT bug reports is a sure way to get blue balls
1 Like
yep, i also love making bug reports that get ignored
Thats a Ukraine dlc skin!
As a sign of solidarity 😜
Pff, I prefer bug reports where developers look at sources and say, nah, dont think thats possible(not talking about that one EF report now).
4 Likes
The block 3 9X apparently has 60 percent greater range than current block 2 9X. Which should put it at around 32 KM range. Which is still less than mica and ASRAAM. Also, what’s the peregrine? Never heard of it before.
Small Raytheon missile, in development, supposedly AMRAAM level range with 9X manueverability and advanced seeke
2 Likes
I don’t really see how they can increase the range of the missile by 60% without changing the outer body. They changed the front fins a bit but I don’t believe that this is going to reduce the drag by such an amount to allow for 60% greater range.
Since they also kept the length I don’t think they added a lot more propellant either. I guess they mainly imporved the seeker and it now gets
“+60% range! At a very specific test window at bad weather conditions”
It’s called a digital autopilot, advanced energy respecting / conserving guidance laws and Lofting / trajectory shaping and probably reoptimizing / mapping the Center of mass / pressure / lift shifting as it though to motor burnout. as well as advances to propellant grain structure & construction techniques, each one of these changes cribs slight percentages that compound together. Or just straight up comparing it to the baseline AIM-9X, which is basically just a -9M with a fancy seeker.
Basically there are a ton of little things that can be done, especially if you set up the showcase scenario to need as little correction as possible, it’s almost certainly a supersonic launch against a faster closing target that does not maneuver, possibly with data-linked sensor providing positional updates throughout flight to avoid being limited by the on board seeker’s resolution.
The -9X-3 is the Block 2Plus and as such revised a ton of stuff, all the -4 did was replace the mechanical INS with a laser ring system, as it was responsible for 80% of BIT failures in the fleet, due to aging components.
2 Likes
Because they are still using similarly performing motors and propellants since the 80s
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
I mean…MICA NGs are said to have an increase in range of over 60% in air to air (80km to 130km) and 100% increase in surface to air (20km to 40km) while maintaining the same body, same dimensions/length/weight. So it isn’t a crazy thing.
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
Gaijin: it’s a marketing lie, all Aim-9X variants will have the exact same range as the standard Aim-9L. 😜
I’d believe it if we didn’t have AIM-9M reports on hand that actually quote range values.
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/PX7CKrwWNGdr
1 Like
Yep, though that report is just lock ranges, and not even actual range performance improvements from L to M (if there are any)
They use a similar motor geometry, and with the shift to early Low / no-smoke formulations, the propellant for the -9M likely actually has reduced performance due to lacking aluminum in the mix, or otherwise needing to include a some sort of chemical masking agent, and as such decreasing the ratio of active to inert parts of the motor formulation.
As the main culprit for the smoke is fine particulates of Aluminum oxide being produced preferentially if the relative humidity & temperature was above some value due to the way it acts as a catalyst that favors certain branches of the net equilibrium reaction(s) that occur chemically to generate the gasses used to propel the missile.
The thing is that until fairly recently Aluminum was the best choice for the oxidizer for solid rocket motors components if maximizing performance above all else was needed, and the better options are practically exotic material that are complicated to produce at the scales needed for mass production in comparison.
1 Like
Is there a reason the external cockpit screens don’t… match the internal ones?
1 Like
I want my blue and yellow ball