So you don’t think the same ruels apply to a jet?
How foolish of you
Actually, I think the default set up these days, is running pure flares in the large calibre internals and pure chaff in the BOLs.
That way you dont have to waste flares having to assume what is being dropped is a BOL. But still, Pre-flaring might protect you from a Magic II, i’ve had mixed success with a Magic II fired from extremely short range at me and doesnt do anything against a MICA EM, BOL Chaff isnt good enough to defeat anything on its own
Looks legit, now where is this from
Unless I used noise detection wrong, he did, although pretty sure a source can be given, as this can also be from a game or whatever
I just made a post relating to the EF as a work around to the Brimstone nerf any thoughts? Litening III Targeting Pod Capabilities
I thought gaijin didn’t use pictures as sources
hey surbaisse how do we measure speed ingame
i am making a suggestion and i dont really know what is the fitted top speed because alot of sources stated differently
like some stated mach 2.0 is ~2200km/h and some stated ~2500km/h and some stated ~1300km/h
Combined with the secondary sources confirming that AMRAAM on inner pylons is possible. It might be enough.
But they dont inherrently trust them outright because of how easy it is to photoshop them.
So they could turn around and give a million reasons as to reject this image and more than a few would be fair (like the quality being too low to confirm what is on the pylon). There is every chance they will reject any image, even ones that are vertifiable as an excuse to avoid buffing the Typhoon.
What is probably need is video footage of a Typhoon with AMRAAM/METEOR on those pylons or photos from a million angles from an event like an airshow and or a primary source.
they do in case of carried weapons.
so if you have a picture of a Eurofighter carrying 10 Amraams it can be used to bug report the loadout
Can’t help with that, I’m terrible at math
Is this used to spot photoshopping?
yes to a certain extend
Never thought to use noise as a way to check the validity of an image, that is clever
So that’s effectively proof of amraam’s being mounted there? -_-
aww
Yes. However it cannot detect if its from some very advanced imaginary AI, a game or an actual irl image
something like this ?
well it could be from a game, you cant really tell because of the low image quality