Spoiler
(laugh)
≈30s is the actual figure
1 Like
he said “maybe like 5 seconds” so he’s likely overexaggerating it on purpose
Confirmation that UK Eurofighters were planned to carry a 6 x ASRAAM + 4 x AMRAAM loadout:
12 Likes
Now that will be a deadly loadout
yeah we already speculated this with the german thread, that instead of fuel tanks more missles could be equipped
´this doesnt quite clarify if its possible to carry 6 + 4 + 3FT.
but i personally dont think thats up for debate when all of the pylons have the necessary wiring and the manufacturer of the mounting point literally says that they have the necessary mechanical interface and electrical connections to mount a missile rail lol
2 Likes
I suspect the EF will have a high fuel burn, so perhaps that central 1500 litre tank may still be useful for getting into battle and then being dropped to maximise performance.
I think if they were to deny it’s existence they would be utterly deluded, however they will probably choose to restrict their usage for ‘balance’.
But dual SRAAM pylons exist for the EF anyway so there’s ways around it anyway.
yeah but it can super cruise so you won’t need to afterburn much
That’s true and as a controller player, I’ll enjoy that the most because we can’t use half-burner.
I am looking forward to getting the aircraft (but not grinding it out, that’s going to be hell).
1 Like
that’s about 9kg/s max reheat, ~2,7kg/s max dry
at full internal fuel of about 5 tonnes you can be cruising around at maximum reheat for 9 minutes and 15 seconds if my calculations aren’t wrong
or over half an hour with max reheat
a 1000L fuel tank gives somewhere around 800kg of extra fuel so around 1,5 min in max reheat and around 5 minutes in max dry power
just do remember that reheat isnt even used irl for takeoff; its that powerful
5 Likes
you made a typo, right?
5000 kg / 5 tonnes, isn’t it?
u dont know about the anti grav fuel tanks?
yeah i meant 5 tonnes
unless…
1 Like
lmao forgive my ignorance
Advertisement showing double bomb racks on the inner pylons(they’ve shown this before, even on real aircraft or at least on mockups)
1 Like
4 x MBDA Meteor
2 x ASRAAM
6 x Brimstone (2 racks of 3)
2 Storm Shadows
4 x LGB’s (2x2 double racks on inner pylon)
1 x Centerline mounted TGP
Same loadout but on IRL aircraft :)
7 Likes
how i hope the german and italian eurofighters get the same loadout because they all are compatible with brimstone right from the start (tranche 2 if i remember right), just gotta switch asraam with iris t and storm with taurus,
And i could be wrong here, but wouldnt this loadout be even heavier then the 14meteor 2 asraam/iris t loadout that was shown once?
oh its much heavier. hell, even a normal 6x bombs loadout is heavier. its not about the weight really. if they wanted they could strap a shit ton of weight to it as it has a massive wing and a crap ton of thrust.
the problem is clearance. height is an issue but width and length(in case of the inner wing pylon) are the biggest culprits.
This aircraft is capable of so much more and it only does so “”““little””“” because the countries using it say its enough.
well they say that but we all know they dont mean it and its just a problem of not wanting to get the funding…