1 Like
I have yet to see anyone actually provide a primary source that the Typhoon is over-performing.
All i’ve seen is people accusing us of “burying data” and people claiming that the FM is wrong without providing any said proof.
If the FM is ACTUALLY overperforming with verified primary sources. Then fine, but all im seeing at the moment is people reeling from not being able to fight the Typhoon currently. We always knew it was going to be a meta aircraft
7 Likes
What i can promise you, it is that most if not all sources were handed over to the devs. They will tweak the model according to them.
1 Like
I mean they can do that but in the end keeping aircraft busted only ends up ruining the game, because tables flip. We all know that if EFT will dominate harder than what the F-15s did some other nation (right now probably russia) that was on the back foot will get an even more insanely busted plane and the cycle goes on. Last time top tier was somewhat balanced is nearly 2 years ago.
I remember that, hopefully it won’t repeat
1 Like
They dont understand that the people maybe just dont want to share primary sources publicaly which they paid access for.
I trust Gunjob, flame etc to make the right reports since they have all the stuff gathered we need
2 Likes
Yep, I thought Gunjob would have done that already. So we’ll have to wait and see, But I do feel like people are expecting it to have an FM of a Tornado, which is really funny
2 Likes
Yep, whilst we get accused of “burying sources” truth is plenty gets reported and result in nerfs.
Yea, people here somehow think you are forced to share them. Everyone can ask, and you can share them, but you do not need to. As long as you use them in the reports, and they are accepted nothing else matters.
1 Like
EJ200 characteristics were selected to optimize performance at 1.8 mach and also at 0.9 mach it was not optimized for supercruise consumption even if it was still capable of doing so imo. @Flame2512
Also, notably; they are saying 10.0 T/W is given for 0.75 mach at sea level conditions here?
Engine mass is alleged 2,180 pounds. They estimate 10:1 thrust to weight under those conditions it would imply thrust is ~21,800 lb-f or 9,888kgf? What do you think?
No one wants to force anyone to share stuff, At least me and few people i’ve seen here only asked
An interesting thing happens when capturing a ground target. Look at the angles. It looks like a 300% bug. Although it seems to me that it looks like a blank for a common datalink. Because if I launch an amraam at a course of 0, then turn 180, try to capture a ground target, then I will be able to see my missiles flying on the datalink behind me
P.S. It works the same way with air-to-air lock
My only issue with the FM of it is that Rafale is having a very hard time competing with it when people don’t just try and run in a straight line. But Rafale is so very not finished, so I’ll complain once Rafale drops without changes on account of being French.
I’m not pointing fingers, just saying in general.
Try using full control for rafale
i had that a couple times when trying to lock an air target and it bricked my radar
Yep, it probably is by quite a bit.
Nah, it just bugs out. Still very much wip
tbf, burying sources is a thing that happens and imo is incredibly annoying. We already have the gaijin devs hiding their sources from us, we dont need other players doing it too, but thats my 2 cents on the matter.
I get the whole “i paid for this, so its mine” mentality, but its info you’re planning on using for a vehicle in a game we all play, whats the harm in letting other ppl see the numbers. Helps stop all this discourse about overperforming or underperforming things and give us something concrete instead of ppl’s pre-conceived biases.
7 Likes