if you look a bit down, it also is ticked off for Deep Strike with Taurus. F/A-18 doesnt use Taurus
yeah thats why i said they could have just been lazy
yeah they probably just didnt want 2 columns with only one box each
ASRAAM and NGCCM (which is just a locally produced ASRAAM B6)
But this is the wrong topic anyway
2 Likes
nice I still need to grind for it just cant really be bothered to play the Grippen lol
The grind was actually not that bad, 2x 9M + 4x R-Darter works good ))))
Now I have 2 from 3 EFs…
2 Likes
Now you’ll be able to play the Good Typhoon :P
Just Talisman the GR4 :P
I dont have it since I didnt see the point originally the Harrier Gr7 kinda carried me lol
Just because the snail is to lazy to modell the missing IRST (weight) in the FM of the German one…
But didnt they have a ballast instead in the German Typhoon? That way the aircraft balance wasnt affected by its absence?
No clue on that,
But for sure it would result in an better airflow ))))
Considering this image shows a 90 degree bank, would there be any issues considering the current ±45 degree angle implementation of the MAW with maintaining the actual track of the missile? I’m concerned that it would just immediately drop the MAW warning the moment you bank out of angle like it does currently
It’s the RWR providing the escape zone, you don’t need the MAW for ARH/SARH.
1 Like
Does the system not work with IR?
I’d imagine it can for sure, but you don’t need an escape vector with IR, either you beat it with flares or you don’t. That’s modern IIR combat.
Unless it provided the necessary vectors for getting BOL into the optimal place to block an IIR missile.