Because they are still using similarly performing motors and propellants since the 80s
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
I mean…MICA NGs are said to have an increase in range of over 60% in air to air (80km to 130km) and 100% increase in surface to air (20km to 40km) while maintaining the same body, same dimensions/length/weight. So it isn’t a crazy thing.
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
Gaijin: it’s a marketing lie, all Aim-9X variants will have the exact same range as the standard Aim-9L. 😜
I’d believe it if we didn’t have AIM-9M reports on hand that actually quote range values.
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/PX7CKrwWNGdr
1 Like
Yep, though that report is just lock ranges, and not even actual range performance improvements from L to M (if there are any)
They use a similar motor geometry, and with the shift to early Low / no-smoke formulations, the propellant for the -9M likely actually has reduced performance due to lacking aluminum in the mix, or otherwise needing to include a some sort of chemical masking agent, and as such decreasing the ratio of active to inert parts of the motor formulation.
As the main culprit for the smoke is fine particulates of Aluminum oxide being produced preferentially if the relative humidity & temperature was above some value due to the way it acts as a catalyst that favors certain branches of the net equilibrium reaction(s) that occur chemically to generate the gasses used to propel the missile.
The thing is that until fairly recently Aluminum was the best choice for the oxidizer for solid rocket motors components if maximizing performance above all else was needed, and the better options are practically exotic material that are complicated to produce at the scales needed for mass production in comparison.
1 Like
Is there a reason the external cockpit screens don’t… match the internal ones?
1 Like
I want my blue and yellow ball
1 Like
The MICA NG got a different dual pulse motor compared to the older MICA, but even then the brochure only says “up to 40%” and doesn’t give any indication of actual conditions.
Further down it states “double the interception range” which again doesn’t state conditions and certainly doesn’t match the earlier claim of +40%.
All manufacturers will claim to have the best capability and most of their claims are only from a very select used case in which their product is especially good compared to the competition.
Randomly found an image of PGM 500 being displayed next to a EFT. Idk if this got posted here already
10 Likes
I want
Ir guided bombs?
The same that can be found on UK Tornado GR.1/4
Something half way between a glide bomb and an AGM. Can be Laser, TV or IR guided iirc.
Nice find. Where did you stumble upon that?
This looks like an DA.1 Eurofighter
Edit:
Could it be?
found an Picture of the Dubai air Show 1998
https://images.app.goo.gl/p9YVBtGSqShneBXu6
What are those on the bottom left
Seems to be the Brimstone Pylon, I would say those are Brimstone
Yep, Brimstone
