What is your findings?
eurofighter dose lose more speed when holding s compared to rafale, but it is also doing about 1deg/s more than the rafale. if you were to do a more thorough test my guess would be they are about equal.
Maybe, there is also the thrust recovery time which seems substantially greater in the Typhoon from what others have said before on this matter and in my own personal experience, it feels rather sluggish to begin accelerating at times.
It is certainly worth a thorough investigation
Wow what a trip!
That lead pilot could fly this route with his eyes closed
I do like the blue/grey scheme the Luftwaffe use for Typhoons.
OK, so why is the thrust 10% lower than when you are at 0 speed.
what?
it the first one zero airspeed/ static thrust?
The slats never deploy enough
love it
heh It’s way too hard to make it accurate but yeah I also got the wrong loadout, my fault
Left is static, sea level thrust, right is high AOA/Low Speed.
There is absolutely no reason for the thrust to be lower
whats ur point
I meant to say it’s a game mechanic fault
thats just the thrust curve the EF and Rafale have ingame
but good luck explaining that it shouldnt drop below static thrust
his point is that engines should always have atleast their static thrust
In simple terms:
static thrust is achived by the engine itself sucking air in and useing that to generate thrust,
it is more or less impossible gicing a engine less air unless you are flying backwards or something stupid like that.
so it dosent make any sene for both the eurofighter and rafale to have speeds where they generate less than static thrust
2 Likes
“so it dosent make any sene for both the eurofighter and rafale to have speeds where they generate less than static thrust” every other jet powered plane in the game has areas where they make less than static thrust what are you talking about