what missile is this
Looks kinda like an ASRAAM but not certain.
It’s not a missile. It’s a dummy.
1 Like
Yeah, was thinking the same.
Thats just completely untrue. FM performance is incredibly important for early game by impacting how aggressive you can be. The EF and Rafale can launch missiles at higher speeds and launch them closer to targets safely because they can easily defend by going cold.
and attacking like that is just as dependent on the radar being able to adequately find let alone guide the missile.
Id rather take something with a weaker FM but decent radar and loadout over the Typhoon currently. Heck. I do, I have more fun in ARB in the F3 Late than I do in the Typhoon.
The irony of judging someone for playing a few games in the Eurofighter, from someone who hasn’t played it at all…
2 Likes
i am parroting people who have played it for longer than either of these people combined
I’m gonna be blunt here, I honestly don’t care whether you’re listening to people telling you their views, because you can just misinterpret what they’re saying, or end up paraphrasing inaccurately. Not saying that’s what you’re doing all the time, but it makes your opinions virtually meaningless when it’s coming from a secondary source, if you’re going to post in a vehicle’s forum page, please at least play the vehicle first…
2 Likes
The radar is perfectly fine man. And people saying its worse than it was before double scan fix + tws + are insane. Medium scan feels so much better than what it once was.
The TWS still barely tracks a gently maneuvering target.
It still barely detects easy targets to detect (heck I have no idea how many times a target should have been detected but wasnt and I never knew because unlike in RB where you can just hard lock everything and have flashing beacons telling you where enemies are you 100% dependent on the TWS actually finding the target in ASB)
and it still produces constant ghost contacts
and thats just basic stuff.
We still barely have a radar more capable than the blue vixen, even with those things fixed.
Where is Priority track? That could be laughably easy to implement, just C&P AESA code over to it, but no… Gaijin of course has to use the excuse of “This feature isnt in the game yet” as a reason to artificially nerf the Typhoon . It is in the game, its found on AESA radars.
I still find myself relying upon Tpod thermals and the Mk2 eyeball far more than the radar. 6+4 is rapidly becoming my normal ASB fit, because AMRAAMs just arent as usable as they should be. Whenever I do play it, I play so stupidly defensively, I mgiht as well be in the Tornado F3 Late or Sea Harrier FA2 because the Typhoon is hopelessly outclassed in the radar department by the Rafale and SU-30SM, its DOA half the time
Just because you can hard lock people using the HMD in ARB, doesnt mean “its fine” and even if it was still a buggy mess. still 0 excuse for it to be so heavily artificially nerfed. Given everyone else is getting every possible buff for their top tier aircraft, it would be nice if the Typhoon could just be modeled even partially correct
2 Likes
What? I mostly play SB. I barely have any games at top tier in rb. What are you talking about using hms in rb? i mostly use hms in sim
Fine, You play ASB. Are you reliably getting long range TWS medium scan locks enabling BVR combat or are you hugging the deck and forcing close range WVR fights using ACM and HMD to hard lock the target to fire an AMRAAM?
I mean, he just admitted to mostly using HMS in sim, which means even he knows the radars trash and he’s just playing devils advocate…
1 Like
i dont see any issue with it
Trying it in SB now (my god Su-30 spamming R-77-1 and just spawn camping is just annoying as hell) but both my kills so far are with HMD aimed Aim-9Ms
Well, it depends. Am I flying on a map with lots of terrain? Afghanistan, rocky canyon, spain, etc? Then I’m going rat mode, with hms and only quick narrow scan to ID. But, when flying super flat maps, like sinai, I use the radar. And even then, it’s still super easy to keep track of people with the radar, because there’s no obstructions. Even the flanker radar is fine on flat maps. Plus, because of the HMD ID thing, you know exactly where all the enemies are if your radar gets even a small glimpse of the target, allowing you to hms lock them.
Meanwhile, in aircraft like the FA2 or F3. Im quite happy just sticking in TWS the entire time and it will find targets quickly, track them just fine and allow me to engage without having to use ACM (as of course no HMD)
The TWS+ issues exists. Maybe they’ve replaced the Typhoons problems, maybe they haven’t. We’ll have to see if/when they fix TWS+
There are a few in this thread (who havent got a single match in the Typhoon) that are arguing that hte Typhoons radar should be artificially nerfed because the FM is good enough to win dogfights, which is of course a stupid argument.
After 2+ yeras of nerfed aircraft after nerfed aircraft and waiting to finally get the Typhoon whislt everyone else has been enjoying ever more powerful aircraft. It would be nice if it was historically modeled. No nerfs, no Britain tax, nothing. It was like everyone elses aircraft always seem. Modeled as closely to IRL performance, and in this regard, there is no doubt about it. The Typhoons radar is a shadow of its IRL glory.
“whislt everyone else has been enjoying ever more powerful aircraft” you seem to have completely forgotten about the gripen huh