What’s going on with my amraam pylon
Is that the rumored twin amraam pylon?
Its for jousting
3 Likes
No, thats just an Old bug which somehow adds the Visuel Texture of the Pylon infront of the real pylon
The rumored twin AMRAAM pylon is just an Copy Pasta Twin Pylon which is used for the Sidewinder, (its the same)
Guess i forgot to add the /j
My bad
Model is bugged in the 2nd and 3rd LOD. You’ll only see this when the model is displaying a lower Level of Detail for performance/optimisation reasons. And it’ll disappear when the model uses the highest detail model (lod_0) again
“pylon_3” mesh is placed too far forward for some reason, so it sits in front of “mfrl_002”
It’s the same in lod_1 and lod_2 on all three Eurofighter models.
1 Like
How do you view it like this ?
CDK Asset Viewer
And is there a way to view that double aim120 pylon for eurofighter that’s in the files?
There are several dual-rail AIM-120 launcher models in the files. I assume most for US jets.
I don’t know what one the Eurofighter was supposed to use, or whether it was just using the same one it uses for dual AIM-9s
1 Like
In the files its just the an Copy pasta pylon which is allready in use for the Sidewinder
Aka, you want to see the twin pylon for AMRAAM?
Well, you can allready in game…
Just look at the Dual Sidewinder
1 Like
So what is stopping Eurofighter from having double pylon aamrams, just game balance?
There’s currently no proof the FCS accepts more than 6x MRAAM’s nor any pictures of the jet with more.
2 Likes
Proof.
Though double mounts are highly unlikely. More likely to get the AMRAAM on the inner wing pylons. But again. No absolute proof that it was done. Just secondary sources suggesting its possible
3 Likes
As if the su27SM has proof for double rail pylon or rafale with 8 micas that was only used with the F4 or any other exported variants
1 Like
I just don’t see why this is any different than the Yak 141 IRST, Thai Alpha Jet Gun pod, su30 double rack r77, etc. Surely it’s just game balance if Gaijin makes exceptions for everyone else
Not to mention a suspicious 25% engine thrust loss in high sustained turns and very long thrust returning acceleration no other jet in the game has, found by one user. This has to be just balancing
Id be willing to bet a lot that even if we find absolute, undeniable proof. Gaijin will try to deny it and claim its fake
It’s ok Gaijin will “find” or action the many reports right about the time the Su-35 gets added along with the F-15EX.
