Eh, surely our Sources are enough to get the Mk.0 ))
If we now take the Response from the BW, it matches with the Post from ESUT using the Mk.0 as an fast gap filler while upgrading it later to the Mk.1
Real, but very old allready
So what’s the point of posting this now?
He likely had in mind that it could be an option for our likely new AESA EFs, so they dont end up like the F-15GE, New Plane, only diffrence beeing an New Radar
2 Likes
Germany gets what they use? I wouldn’t call that getting shafted.
That makes sense, nobody wants it to end up being an F-15C GE, meaning a copy paste with just a radar upgrade.
Sounds more like the first 20 Quadriga EFT’s will have Mk1’s
https://www.indracompany.com/en/noticia/advanced-subsystems-give-eurofighter-radar-mk1-significant-performance-boost
Well maybe getting shafted by the German MOD?
3 Likes
RAF be like “First time?”
3 Likes
Seems like Leonardo is stepping up to help Hensoldt;
https://www.leonardo.com/documents/15646808/20369421/ComLDO_Hensoldt_Germay_Spain_14_01_2022_ENG.pdf?t=1642153417735
1 Like
Well how ever it comes I hope they make the radar good
For the Quadriga Yes, but looking at the text it implies that our earlier ones example T3, that sounds heavely like the Mk.0
I’ve found nothing from Leonardo that they have orders for anything other than the Gulf state Typhoons.
I will write an mail to the BW, hopefully they can confirm the ESUT post
Surprisingly fast emails from the Bundeswehr compared to like, a UK FOI.
Always multiple months waits for anything that remotely comes close to NETMA.
1 Like
I wonder, could the NETMA confirm an Inner Pylon AMRAAM :))
1 Like
That would be nice, but they’d refuse to even comment.
Sounds about right, the agencies aren’t good at talking to eachother as i’m currently discovering.
Ahah yeah no, I’m currently in a long FOI dispute that revolves around NETMA and the MOD using that as a catch all to do nothing.
1 Like