Is CAMM and ASRAAM similar?
CAMM is an ASRAAM.
But instead of IIR its ARH and has DL.
So the CAMM has slightly more weight and is slightly more aerodynamic, but essentially the same core missile
oh and CAMM has a booster/turn over pack as well.
It quickly loses speed, and between 15-around 20km, depending on launch conditions, it is already subsonic, making it useless at longer ranges.
This is CAMM it is advertised max effective range, target was a flying in a straight, slightly rotated relative to the launcher, line plane

Can we expect that they have fixed the stretched HUD on the Eurofighter in this update?
I don’t think it’s ever getting fixed at this point lol
fixed: hud removed
Its not even safe joking about that…
Look at the FRS1’s HUD… It got “fixed” and has been missing a gunsight entirely ever since…
Are new EFT reports worth adding during an update like this?
They are always worth doing. If something is not reported it won’t be fixed.
Out of interest, what did you have in mind?
Afterburner nozzle inaccuracies, morvan mentioned the captor M, maybe HUD tint again
All those have been reported.
(bar maybe another report for radar reliability for the CAPTOR-M, gunna see after this update though)
I mean reporting them again
They’ll get closed as duplicates.
Could try bringing up the existing reports in the dev forum. But that only sometimes works
But im looking forward to the patch notes. see if there is actually any bug fixes worth noting
Please don’t create duplicates of existing reports. I’m just going to mark it as a duplicate and close it.
At this point, I’m going to wait until the December update for them to add the Eurofighter with the AESA radar and the new, more diverse weapon loadout including f&f.
I think it’ll be the Tranche 3 or a block above the current Tranche 2 and I’ll just pray it comes with all the bugs fixed.
Also, I think I’ll have to grind the British Eurofighter, since I’m not sure if the German one will get all the upgrades, although, knowing Gaijin, who knows.
Im curious of how bad they’ll gimp the CAPTOR-E if/when they ever add it.
We have a bare minum scan rate for it thats like 4x faster than the RBE2-AA is in-game atm, which is the same source used for the current CAPTOR-M scan rate, so theres no reason they should refuse it, but I wouldnt put it passed the devs to nail that one with another “marketting lie” or just ignore the bug report altogether…
At least it will be better than the actual CAPTOR
Im currently expecting the CAPTOR-E and the Gripen Es AESA radar to be the same radar and the final result to be a wierd amalgam of both using sources from both with a bit of Rafale radar thrown in
Yeah should be for sure. It’ll be interesting in sim as well wiyh the HMD overlay for TWS
Idk much about the ES-05 Raven beyond it being a swashplate AESA like ECRS tbh. I wouldnt be surprised or really against it if they were super similar in-game, with ECRS just having more range (largely irrelevant anyways).
This is what I’m hoping for, to use the radar with the full pattern