To my knowledge those are only speculative figures, the only advertised range I know of is the 100km NEZ. MBDA latest materials don’t give any range figures at all for Meteor nowadays.
do we have a guesstimate on its speed vs something like the PL-15 or are they both still too recent
Is this saying meteor is still at Mach 4 at 100km or just that it reaches it during the flight
[Citation needed]
2 Likes
I bet it’s the same person who has the art of an R-74M2 fitted on a 27ER booster
It’s a forum where you can share pixel art style drawing of military things
it is however separated into distinct zones of differing levels of fictionality, this is from the 2nd most fictional category
1 Like
Calm down bud you’re in the Alt-History Sphere now
Its just a rending issue, likely from converting the file from PPT to PDF or any number of reasons. hAnDdRaWn is such a sill thing to say when actual NEZ diagrams are often hand drawn…
help my graph is hand drawn D:
uhh wasn’t denying the graph, just saying it looks hand drawn
2 Likes
I believe its a Meteor with an ASTER 30 booster strapped onto it. But shipborne missiles don’t have the same design constraints that air launched ones do, so Ramjet doesn’t make sense as a propulsion method compared to just making a bigger missile. Unless you’re making a land attack missile that is.
1 Like
I think that could fit on the belly pylon of the Typhoon :P
Probably, but if absolutely nothing else, the RWR should give some indication of the elevation of the RWR ping, which would massively narrow down the search area. Currently in game, I have to scan from the floor all the way up to space and hope the target is actually detected as I increase the elevation. Its a chore.
1 Like
Oooor you could have a bigger ramjet missile
yeah that explanation makes more sense than missile intercourse
But its still kinda that
I don’t think anything was meant against the graph it’s just really funny to see an actual v/x or v/t graph for official use that looks like it was drawn in a classroom.
I feel like for aircraft with advanced HMS gaijin should add UI elements in 3rd person like the missile diamond, but with things like radar targets and RWR contacts (also the missile diamond for aircraft with that capability in modes without it). Can help with seeing the environment in 3 dimensions instead of relying on an outdated 2d UI.
On the other hand knowing what sensor view is like, and considering it’s a similar concept, I don’t want to be flashbanged by the unmatched power of the sun because an RWR contact bugged out
Yeah, its a shame the HMD is just… forgotten, in ARB. Would love for aircraft specific cockpit elements to be options to replace the generic third person elements.
Though I am looking it more from the perspective of ASB with no markers, as in ARB, its usually not hard to find the target because there is marker
Yeah I mean that’s what the HMD is for. I don’t think the RWR display does actually significantly indicate the vertical difference (apart for if it can create a trackfile on it). We’d benefit more from the ability to just look at the target and know.
its delta V is actually higher than you calculated , if u assume the same specific impulse or exhaust velocity as CAMM u will get delta V as 1336.5 m/s
but gaijin can simply decrease its battery time , everywhere its reported that max range of ASRAAM is 25km (i wont be surprised if it automatically self destructs at 25km in war thunder , cus none of the missiles in game can travel further than the advertised range - this is probably bad news for asraam ). its also 11 kg lighter than the CAMM its not just due to the seeker head. ( earlier cold war era missiles had a smaller difference 7kg between r27er and r27et , 8kg difference between r24r , r24t). so asraam may have lower battery life than CAMM or a bit less fuel (which will slightly decrease its delta V).