It will equalize. At least specific current differences
AESA Vs buggy M-scan, in a gamemode like ASB where radar performance actually matters AESA will always win.
I can be sat there trying to locate the target on my RWR for so long that any advantage I might have had with AMRAAM is gone.
As for HOBS, take 2 identical aircraft, give one HOBS and other non-HOBS, the HOBS aircraft will probably always win in a dogfight. So give everyone HOBS and the advantage the Rafale can currently exploit gets heavily mitigated
To my knowledge those are only speculative figures, the only advertised range I know of is the 100km NEZ. MBDA latest materials don’t give any range figures at all for Meteor nowadays.
It’s a forum where you can share pixel art style drawing of military things it is however separated into distinct zones of differing levels of fictionality, this is from the 2nd most fictional category
Its just a rending issue, likely from converting the file from PPT to PDF or any number of reasons. hAnDdRaWn is such a sill thing to say when actual NEZ diagrams are often hand drawn…
I believe its a Meteor with an ASTER 30 booster strapped onto it. But shipborne missiles don’t have the same design constraints that air launched ones do, so Ramjet doesn’t make sense as a propulsion method compared to just making a bigger missile. Unless you’re making a land attack missile that is.
Probably, but if absolutely nothing else, the RWR should give some indication of the elevation of the RWR ping, which would massively narrow down the search area. Currently in game, I have to scan from the floor all the way up to space and hope the target is actually detected as I increase the elevation. Its a chore.
